Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 26	June 28 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Peekaboo Galaxy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks OK at a first glance, but fails the notability criteria for astronomical objects on closer inspection. The available sourcing is one paper that has been cited a grand total of 5 times, 3 of those by the original authors and the other 2 being passing mentions. The original announcement was greeted by a typical flash-in-the-pan of pop-science website coverage, all based on press releases. (It's easy to get splashy churned hype about astronomy stories, but much harder to get reporting that passes the "quote a person not involved in the original study" sniff test.) Trim the fluff, and nothing remains. If PGC 5060432 does need to be covered, anything worth saying about it can be covered in a couple sentences in an article about a broader astronomical topic to which it is relevant. XOR'easter (talk) 23:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative keep: I'm inclined to lean toward a keep since the object has only just become readily observable, and the paper did receive secondary coverage in a number of reliable sources. The paper itself discusses studies of the object from different observatories (HIPASS, ATCA, GALEX, then Hubble and SALT). Also, the object was supposedly identified as a dwarf galaxy using GALAX, not by the paper authors. Praemonitus (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: notable for being "one of the most metal-poor, least chemically enriched" galaxies. If future HST/JWST results find it to be 'average', 'meh', 'boring', etc., then I'd lean merge & delete. Keep until such time, since astronomy takes time. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 10:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surely that's a reason to cover it at Metallicity#Galaxies, where it is already mentioned? XOR'easter (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
weak Keep. This is kind of a marginal case. The recent work on this galaxy does give some pretty interesting results, but one could argue that it's also WP:TOOSOON since the paper in question was just published in 2023 and only has a few citations to date. The one thing that I do feel strongly about is that if the article is kept, the title should be changed to an actual catalog name of the galaxy, because the name "Peekaboo galaxy" just sounds awfully dumb, and I really hope that name won't continue to be used in future scientific papers on this object. Aldebarium (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can we go ahead and move the article to a catalog name now? I really dislike "peekaboo galaxy". Makes my skin crawl. Viriditas (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WLLS-LP[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The only source is an FCC license. Let'srun (talk) 23:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pennsylvania. Let'srun (talk) 23:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination. -- D'n'B-t -- 09:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No sources, no article. --Danubeball (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Non-notable television station. TH1980 (talk) 01:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Amazon Games. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relentless Studios[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently notable. Could be replaced by a category, redirect to Amazon Games? IgelRM (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Washington. IgelRM (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only division under [[Amazon Games#:~:text=33][34]-,Divisions,-[edit]|Amazon Games]] given a distinctive name. It's also the division that released Amazon Games' first major original title and their first foray into Windows gaming, Crucible, which notably had matchmaking ended and all servers taken down only six months after release. Askaqp (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just labeling something doesn't give notability for an article. But maybe merging into Crucible (video game) would be better? IgelRM (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Amazon Games. Even if enough to meet GNG is found, this appears to be a NOPAGE situation where there's plenty of room to cover this in the main article. Jclemens (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 22:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two different merge targets have been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jake Wartenberg (talk) 23:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: with Amazon Games, since it is one of the divisions. They released games before and after Crucible so it doesn’t seem right to be merged with that single game.Prof.PMarini (talk) 07:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Eashvar Karthic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Main issue: the 2nd film of the director never released --> WP:TOOEARLY. This guy only directed one released film, not meeting Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative professionals since the film received mixed reviews. The notabliity guidleine states that the director creates a "well-known work or collective body of work". As of 2024, the work is not well known, it is a single film with mixed reviews, not a critically acclaimed film. I don't know if a writeup by an assistant professor at American College, Madurai holds any weightage but that info can be added to Penguin, the director's only released film. The deletion was caused by an undo of a redirect to Penguin. Long sources are mainly direct interviews about Penguin, not independent. Acting roles seem minor and not notable.

If anybody who directs one film, gets an article, doesn't this set a bad precedent. The film didn't win a National Award or any award for that matter.

This source [1] talks about six films including Penguin, all of this information pertaining to Penguin should be moved to the film article. This director can be notable after more of his works release. DareshMohan (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 23:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: if you are wondering what the contents of source #7 is, it is here: [2] The story focuses on the pain and struggles suffered by the female lead. A pregnant woman remembers her child who went missing years ago. After the child’s missing, her husband started becoming toxic by saying she was the reason for the loss and separated ways from her. Later after years, a male character was shown who accepted her as she is and started living happily with her. No strong characterization or importance was given to both these male roles. They are just part of the screenplay.

That's just the plot of the film. How is it scholarly analysis? The assistant professor mentioned above [3] (page 100) is the only significant analysis but that is of the film and can be added to Penguin.

Just redirect to Penguin till Zebra (his second film) releases. DareshMohan (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: meets WP:DIRECTOR as director of Penguin (film), a notable creation that received coverage, which is what the guideline requires (the said coverage mentions him, see the page about the film). -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Penguin (film): His only directorial credit. The second one has been unreleased for over a year, and doesn't have a Wiki article. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:Actor and WP:Director. AmericanY (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)— AmericanY (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep: This seems like a bad-faith nomination and I believe you are upset about your friend, User:Monhiroe's autopatrolled rights being removed. You first edited this article on 8 October 2023, what changed your mind between then and 19 June, 2024, when you redirected it? Did it take eight months for you to judge its notability? On 19 June, you skimmed through all the articles I have ever created and made some changes on three of them [4][5][6]. Was it to check which ones you could nominate for deletion but couldn't find any, so you thought Eashvar Karthic was borderline because he had only one film and chose to redirect it? Is this how you get back at an editor who may have upset your friend?

The notice you have posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force is not neutral and did not follow WP:APPNOTE. Is your nomination rationale so weak that you are trying to discredit a source simultaneously?

Notability

The main issue you have mentioned in you nomination rationale is countered by WP:FILMMAKER#3 where it explicitly mentions significant or well-known work. It need not be a collective body of work.
I believe the film receiving mixed reviews has no weightage here as we are not debating for WP:FILMMAKER#4c
As of 2024, the work is not well known, it is a single film with mixed reviews, not a critically acclaimed film. - Adding to my previous comments above, the film has been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, which can be verified by checking Penguin (film).
Apart from the above, the film has been cited in journals for three completely different reasons: A film that discusses women-centric films, OTT during the COVID-19 pandemic and representation of the subaltern.
If you had taken the time to read through Source #7, you would have known that the PDF you have linked is another journal that has cited the original source #7's work. In the PDF you have linked, Penguin (film) was selected as one of the films out of all the other women-centric films that were released in 2020. The scholarly analysis is in the findings and conclusion section of the same PDF. The journal entry's objective is independent of the subject, so it's absurd to ask for an analysis about the film when the objective is different.
FWIW, here is another journal that extensively cites the subject's work.

There is significant coverage about the subject and their work. Penguin (film) has also received independent periodical articles, reviews and cited in multiple journals, thereby passing the WP:FILMMAKER criteria. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeraxmoira, I completely agree with you on the notability of this director and, like you, I do indeed disagree with DareshMohan's interpretation of the guideline in the present case, but is your very aggressive opening statement absolutely necessary? I am inviting you to kindly strike it. I don't think it's appropriate here, nor helpful. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any bad-faith nomination will be called out. My statement is true and the diffs/timeline make it clear, so it will not be struck out. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Penguin (film): he has done only 1 film its better he done atleast 3 or 4 movies. Another film he directed was not released yet. WP:TOOEARLY. Monhiroe (talk) 09:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Penguin (film). Case of WP:TOOSOON with only 1 release under this director and has not garnered significant achievement to satisfy notability. RangersRus (talk) 13:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua N. Haldeman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has issues with neutrality (seems angled toward showing that the person is less anti-Semitic than sources suggest), is fluffed with unnecessary information, and it seems this person is not sufficiently notable, with the main thing being Elon Musk's grandfather. Calling neurocalometers "a then-controversial expensive device" also seems skewed. Foxsake92 (talk) 22:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as creator. Welcome to Wikipedia! It's very unusual for a user's first edits to be an AFD, but that's totally okay!! Do you have suggestions for how we could improve the neutrality? In response to your concerns, neurocalometer sentence has been reworded with attribution rather than wikivoice. As far as Notability goes, Haldeman was famous in his own time for his roles in chiropractic and politics, not because of his descendants -- Notablity is not inherited and the article text never actually mentions Haldeman's grandson, whose life didn't really overlap much with Haldeman's. Feoffer (talk) 02:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Archaeology, Medicine, Aviation, South Africa, Canada, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This source seems to be a good place to start. Curbon7 (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. Coverage on [[[7]]]], [[[8]]], [[[9]]], [[[10]]], suggests the subject is notable enough. Prof.PMarini (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article currently cites these sources which each cover Haldeman directly:
- A New Life for Haldeman. 1951. Leader-Post.
- Joshua N Haldeman, DC: the Canadian Years, 1926-1950. 1995. J Can Chiropr Assoc.
- Elon Musk’s Anti-Semitic, Apartheid-Loving Grandfather. 2023. The Atlantic.
- The World According to Elon Musk’s Grandfather. 2023. The New Yorker.

And the other language versions also cite in-depth coverage from CBC News and Business Insider [11]. There are also: [12][13][14][15]. Foxsake92, do you think this meets the criteria at either at Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline (WP:GNG) or Wikipedia:Notability (people) (WP:BIO)? "issues with neutrality" can be handled at the article and its talk page. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 03:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first was written by the subject himself and the second by his son; they're not independent. – Joe (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of people who have lived in Hampstead Garden Suburb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a phonebook. This has been {{cn}} tagged for 2 years, and there is no indication that "living in Hampstead Garden Suburb" is a notable concept (as opposed to a thing that some people happen to do). Walsh90210 (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obviously. A ridiculous and non-encyclopaedic article which may even breach privacy for the people it lists in the present tense. RobinCarmody (talk) 19:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Android games[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ryan York has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are half a million Android games. This page is clearly not feasible in this format and is misleading, with so many missing games. It is impossible to list every Android game here. Why some android games are listed, but nòt the other ones? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan York (talk • contribs) and transcluded to the log at 22:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Repeat after me: AfD is not cleanup. This meets WP: NLIST. Here are seven sources from reputable journalists that demonstrate the subject's notability: 1 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. They discuss subjects ranging from optimizing gaming performance on Android phones to the Google Play Pass to Android games that can be played offline. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listing hundreds of thousands of Android games in this format is simply not possible, and therefore it is misleading. Additionally,

Category:Android (operating system) games list already exist and provides a structured way to list such games, which is how listings should be done for comprehensive lists like these. Specialized databases and resources like the Google Play Store offer extensive, up-to-date lists, making this Wikipedia page redundant and difficult to maintain. Additionally, many of the games listed here lack a source, which alone demonstrates how flawed this list is. Ryan York (talk) 04:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, none of that's true. This doesn't make sense.

Listing hundreds of thousands of Android games in this format is simply not possible, and therefore it is misleading.

How is it misleading? There is a statement at the top of this list that states: This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. That makes it very clear that this list doesn't need to be hundreds of thousands of games long. WP: NLIST, which I'm hoping you've read by now, also says that "editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles". That would also make the article much easier to manage.

Category:Android (operating system) games list [sic] already exist [sic] and ... is how listings should be done for comprehensive lists like these.

That's not a valid reason for deletion: "arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided." Please read WP: NOTDUP.

Additionally, many of the games listed here lack a source, which alone demonstrates how flawed this list is.

Repeat after me: AfD is not cleanup. This is the wrong venue for these concerns, no matter how many times you insist that this list is "flawed". You need to write this on the Talk page of the article, per WP: ATD-E. HyperAccelerated (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to keep saying this. It isn't accurate. Having an implausible scope is not, in fact, a cleanup issue. Sergecross73 msg me 10:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently I do, because this is a cleanup issue. I don't think the scope is implausible, and even if it is, this just means that the list should be split into sublists that are manageable (e.g. by genre or name). HyperAccelerated (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a good sign when you keep saying the same thing over and over again and deletion stances continue rolling in concurrently. I'd recommend some introspection on what's really going on here, and caution you not to WP:BLUDGEON the conversation. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators look for arguments based on Wikipedia policies when closing discussions, like WP: NLIST. I don't think the current arguments for deletion will hold much weight. At best, most of the reasons here are really just reasons to split the list. I see this going one of two ways: either the list's size can be managed by limiting it to notable games, at which point the article should be kept, or it's too big, at which point we should just split the list by genre or name. Split lists like Lists of murders show that splitting massive, difficult-to-complete lists is possible, contrary to what has been asserted in this discussion. Also, there is a difference between civil disagreement and bludgeoning -- accusing good-faith editors of violating WP: BLUDGEON isn't funny. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it going one way - deletion - because a scope of half a million titles (and rapidly increasing every day) isn't manageable. Perhaps with more editing experience you'll understand what people are trying to tell you. Perhaps you have to "live it" to understand. And bludgeoning can happen even in good faith. Sergecross73 msg me 14:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you also read any of the seven sources that I listed to show that this meets WP: NLIST? HyperAccelerated (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The manageability of the list, the proposal to limit entries to notable games or create sublists is not a sufficient solution. Even with these measures, the list remains unwieldy and prone to becoming outdated quickly. The effort required to continuously vet and update the list for notability and accuracy is disproportionate to the benefits it provides.

The argument that deletion discussions are not the venue for cleanup concerns overlooks the fundamental issue of the list’s feasibility. Cleanup is indeed necessary, but the extent of the problems with this list—scope, manageability, and sourcing—indicates that deletion is a more appropriate response. The energy and resources required for ongoing maintenance are better directed towards creating high-quality.

Redundancy with existing categories, unmanageable nature, lack of reliable sourcing, and the disproportionate effort required for maintenance. Deletion will streamline Wikipedia’s content and ensure resources are used more effectively to maintain the quality and reliability of the information provided. The scope is simply too broad. There is a reason why there is no "List of Windows games" or "List of Android apps" on this website. Let me give you another example: I personally log into Wikipedia every day to update lists of Microsoft games and triple-A and double-A console games. Even that can be quite impossible. Ryan York (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of this has anything to do with WP: NLIST. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You either don't want to understand, or you are trolling. Listing 100,000–500,000 games on this format is not possible. If you want to create multiple Wikipedia articles listing Android games by their year or maybe genre, you are welcome to do so. As of now, this list does not even include 1% of Android games, and it is misleading. It is so broad and not up to date that it is simply impossible to list even 1% of the games here. I recommend you check out the List of Europeans discussion. Ryan York (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that this list should be deleted. Attempting to compile a comprehensive list of millions of Android games on Wikipedia is impractical and misleading. Maintaining such a list on Wikipedia would be burdensome and redundant, given the constantly expanding nature of mobile gaming. Deleting this page would uphold Wikipedia's standards for accuracy and relevance, focusing on curated content rather than exhaustive lists. Wariorio10 (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid reason for deleting an article. Please read WP: NLIST and WP: NOTDUP. HyperAccelerated (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed it already. This list should be deleted due to its massive scope. It's not feasible to list half a million games in this format with sources. The largest list in Wikipedia's history, 'List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements,' pales in comparison to the claims made by this list. Wariorio10 (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:OLIST. This is equally as over-extensive as the now-deleted List of Europeans. There are too many potential entries for it to possibly make sense. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP: OLIST is not a guideline for deleting articles (it's an essay), and a list of 240 games does not come close to being "over-extensive". HyperAccelerated (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 240 present is not the issue, it's the approximately half million games missing that is the problem here. (This isn't even hyperbole or exaggeration - it comes from a sourced statement to this effect in the article currently.) Sergecross73 msg me 12:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The essay describes a particular facet of WP:INDISCRIMINATE which is the actual relevant policy here. Saying it is "just an essay" while ignoring the policy behind it doesn't help. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP: INDISCRIMINATE tells us to refer to WP: NLIST, which is the actual policy we should be talking about. It is just an essay, and the policies that are behind it firmly tell us that this article should be kept. HyperAccelerated (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The scope is too wide, it'll be impossible to both list and reliably source the subject in a comprehensive manner. Sergecross73 msg me 10:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most mobile games are published on iOS and other platforms as well, I don't see a point of a list calling these "Android games". List of iOS games and probably others should be deleted too because very few of them are specifically "iOS games". Agree that this is impractical and misleading, even if considering only notable games and not the "half million" missing. Reywas92^Talk 13:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Too much for such lists. Do we need every game of the Angry Birds franchise? And what about games that pre-existed Android? SpacedFarmer (talk) 20:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are there any exclusive games for Android? If the games are ported everywhere, no reason to have them on this list. Dream Focus 23:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Future of the United States Navy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Literally just an out of date list of ships being built. The comparable articles for other navies are rich with prose. At best should be merged without redirect. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear what's actually out of date or if the tag itself is out of date, but that's an editing issue and not a reason for deletion. While prose about the future would be great, the lack therof is also no reason to delete this list. However, I am undecided if this should be merged to List of current ships of the United States Navy#Future ships or kept and renamed to List of future ships of the United States Navy with that section merged here instead. Reywas92^Talk 20:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Category:Military planning shows plenty of lists like this with this naming convention. I don't know why, but there should be a discussion somewhere about this. The items on this list are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles, so this is a valid navigational list, far more useful than a category since additional information is listed. Dream Focus 08:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would argue that it is not out of date since less than a month ago there has been a big update with new auterized ships added. Otherwise I would also agree it could be renamed to List of future ships of the United States Navy as mentioned by Reywas92. 102Legobrick 12:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC+2)
Delete. The article as it currently stands is covered by List of current ships of the United States Navy#Future ships. Redirecting the title to that location is a poor fit because any article at this title should cover more than just future ships (what about aircraft, additional technologies, etc.?). If the article is kept, I would prefer to see it moved to List of future United States Navy ships, similar to List of future Spanish Navy ships. RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/no opinion. There is a significant overlap with List of current ships of the United States Navy#Future ships, hence potentially a content fork. But this page is more detailed, covers partly different data and fits to the series of similar pages for other countries. My very best wishes (talk) 02:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Almost sounding like WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Lorstaking (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Squid (company)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP - mainly sourced to trivial announcements that don't count towards the notability of corporations. After a BEFORE, I am still not seeing the notability here, with the most major article about Matt Nava specifically rather than the company itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Abzû, their most successful game. As it is, the sources don't meet the criteria for establishing the notability of the company. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chimpoo Simpoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. It lacks significant coverage from multiple reliable, independent sources. It lacks in-depth analysis or substantial coverage from reputable publications. The references are primarily primary sources or basic descriptions, which do not provide the necessary independent verification to establish the show's notability. M S Hassan (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Sony_YAY!#Current_programming -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Federation of European Mineral Programs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Engineering, and Europe. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Move to European Mining Course Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Slavonia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person; article is promotional. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Internet, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Chhillar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftify. User:Procyon117 moved over to draft due to poor sourcing but this was reverted by the creator. I'm not convinced that WP:GNG or WP:BIO are met here. The references presented represent the best that can be found on him, as far as I can see. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.aninews.in/news/business/landmark-group-creating-realty-landmarks-while-creating-value-for-end-users-amp-stakeholders20240610181025/		Contains the text The above press release has been provided by NewsVoir. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of the same	Coverage is mostly about his company	✘ No
https://www.news18.com/business/real-estate-sustainable-living-smart-tech-defining-todays-bespoke-luxury-homes-8940012.html			One brief quote	✘ No
https://insightconvey.com/landmark-welcomes-a-paradigm-shift-in-workspace-luxury-with-the-unveiling-of-the-landmark-sales-office/		No evidence that this is WP:RS	Just one long quote from him	✘ No
https://www.business-standard.com/content/press-releases-ani/landmark-group-creating-realty-landmarks-while-creating-value-for-end-users-stakeholders-124061000792_1.html	Sponsored article	As above	Coverage is mostly about his company	✘ No
https://www.landmarkgoc.com/	He owns this company			✘ No
https://www.newsvoir.com/news/news/advertising-branding/landmark-group-creating-realty-landmarks-while-creating-value-for-end-users-stakeholders.html		This is clearly a press release		✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Delete: Totally agree with the source assessment table. I also searched for in-depth coverage from reliable sources but could not find any. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. GrabUp - Talk 07:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. This article fails WP:GNG with mostly unreliable sources and the ones that we could consider somewhat reliable does not show any significant coverage and achievements to satisfy notability about the subject. Page also reads as promotion. RangersRus (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great Immigrants Award[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable award (to 35 people in 2203), with no obvious selection criteria or monetary reward. Coverage is press releases and PR. Could be a redirect to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Possibly a vanity award, a spam magnet at least. Edwardx (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Edwardx,

Please find my reply below. Of course, any further questions I would most certainly answer. This is my first encounter with the Deletion process and I want to make sure it is done properly.

thanks,

Ronald Sexton

I wish to argue in the strongest terms for the Great Immigrant Award remain as an entry in Wikipedia. The award is not a vanity prize, no one can purchase this award and no marketing services are involved.

Adding this to the selection section makes for more clarification:

The award is made by Carnegie Corporation of New York, a philanthropic foundation established in 1911 by Andrew Carnegie to promote the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding. In keeping with this mandate, the Corporation's work focuses on the issues that Andrew Carnegie considered of paramount importance: international peace, the advancement of education and knowledge, and the strength of our democracy. The Great Immigrants award is a part of its democracy program and recognizes naturalized Americans who have made significant contributions that strengthen our democracy and enrich our society. The award is not available for purchase or as a PR/marketing offering. The award aims to bring awareness to the positive contributions of naturalized Americans at large.

The award was begun by the Corporation’s previous President Vartan Gregorian. An immigrant himself, who wish to bring attention the importance of immigrants in all aspects of American life. I am the primary contributor and based this entry on the Vilcek Prize entry. Ronald Sexton (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to for spam magnet, I was in the process of changing the link in the list of awardees to their individual Wikipedia page instead of going to the Corporation's website. Ronald Sexton (talk) 18:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayday (American band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NMUSIC. One of their album articles has one source that reviews the album and that's all I can find. Do not confuse this band with Mayday (Taiwanese band) or ¡Mayday!, two other bands that are both actually notable * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nebraska. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. For starters, the Allmusic link in the article shows both a sizeable band biography and sizeable reviews of all three of their albums. Then, when I search for a review of their second album and Pitchfork shows up as the first Google hit, I don't need any further reinforcement to know the band meets WP:BAND#1. Geschichte (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since Pitchfork was the sole source the nominator could find, as a courtesy I'm also adding the two other extant Pitchfork reviews, as well as the two reviews by Popmatters. Geschichte (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can understand a WP:BEFORE search getting a little crossed up with noise from the other bands with the same name, but this group was widely covered in its day, as one would have expected from a Saddle Creek Records band. The album articles were recently redirected to this band page, and they should be restored; their 2005 release, for instance, meets WP:NALBUM with [16], [17], [18]. Chubbles (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manichandra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under sng or gng. Was a contestant on 4 games shows and won 1. And is a choreographer. Sources (and article content) are just facts related to that. Nothing approaching even 1 GNG source. Creator is indeffed for abuse of multiple accounts. North8000 (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There seems to be no significant coverage and the role played by the subject on the shows apart from the Jodi S9 is not significant as well. Fails GNG. ~~FWIW, I was waiting to G5 this after Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isha.Narain was closed.~~ Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage and achievement in secondary independent reliable sources to satisfy notability. Most sources on the page are unreliable. The page has mostly routine news of the subject as runner up on a Bigg Boss game show that is not sufficient basis for a page on this subject. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

J.J. College of Arts and Science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written promotionally Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. People from the school were a part of several books (albeit endless passing mentions) and the college's tryst with sports is documented (albeit passing mentions). DareshMohan (talk) 06:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just had citation bot go fix bare URLs, this article has been here for almost 7 years now. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 19:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Draftify at most. Not notable and not enough WP:SIGCOV at this time to gather enough information to create a standalone article. Prof.PMarini (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected‎ per last AFD closed yesterday. There was some edit warring going on with that redirect, and it is now fully protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger (2007 film)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequate references to satisfy WP:NFILM, either may be deleted or redirected with relevant articles. Pinakpani (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This should be redirected per previous nomination yesterday. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Backflip Studios[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AfD brought up several interviews, but those are primary sources, and arguments used there do not rise to our current standards. Besides the one SIGCOV Dean Takahashi piece brought up in the previous AfD, it appears to fail WP:NCORP with just trivial mentions and announcements of their closure. Merge to Hasbro perhaps? ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Colorado. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hasbro , since the firm was acquired by Hasbro and the purchase and its subsequent closing were mentioned on that page. Prof.PMarini (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evil-Lyn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 14:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and Comics and animation. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 14:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There appears to be enough sourcing, and the nomination statement doesn't engage with what there is. There are multiple CBR references, but there appear to be enough RS to meet GNG, and the burden of BEFORE is on the nominator to show how what's already in the article does not. Jclemens (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, this just me; but its only a 2 low quality situational Valnet sources [19] [20] in the article + this source from before and for me it isn't enough yet for GNG, due to the source quality. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 20:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:VALNET, which is also cited at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, Valnet sources do not contribute to notability in discussions such as these. As all of these are VALNET, there is no notability displayed right now. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are no less than five non-Valnet online sources and one magazine source listed. The above does not constitute a source analysis. Jclemens (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-The Los Angeles Times source is merely a one sentence mention of Linda Gary voicing her. Same deal for the Polygon source, except with a different VA.

-The San Francisco Chronicle source is a plot summary overview of her character

-The MTV Link is broken, so I cannot view it. I cannot view the SFX sources either.

-The HashtagTV source doesn't seem to even mention her? The source also doesn't seem reliable, and even then is only verifying that she'll appear in an upcoming production.

There's not even commentary or dev info here- at best there's two sources verifying VAs, which is not enough to pass the GNG bar. Nom seems to have done a BEFORE, and a brief BEFORE didn't yield much for me, either. Do note if I've missed anything, but this seems to be a rather minor character with very little additional sourcing to back up any substance. Ref count is not equal to notability. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the MTV link so it works. https://www.mtv.com/news/jat6pt/masters-of-the-universe-classics-faceless-one-review Each to search for the title of something and the name of the source to find it. Dream Focus 09:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but MTV link is broken again; all links to mtv.com archives seem intentionally broken, but wayback may have a copy of it. Regardless, the SFX source has still not been dealt with. Jclemens (talk) 07:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. I don't have the time to go through and search for sources myself to form an opinion on notability, but this is the obvious WP:Alternative to deletion which preserves the article in the history for possible future use and I am pretty sure something from here can improve the corresponding section at the target. Daranios (talk) 15:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article is definitely in a pretty bad state, but Evil-Lyn is one of the most significant characters in the franchise. Given the presence of MOTU: Revelation, a couple of sources do exist pertaining to Lena Headey's portrayal of the character; interviews and reviews. From some research I've done, although critics from the 1980s don't seem to bring up Meg Foster often when discussing the live-action film, retrospective reviews do somewhat often single her out for praise. The article itself may not show it, but sources and coverage of Evil-Lyn do exist.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I don't know what I should respond to this. This looks like WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES argument somehow. Interview sources are primary and does not help GNG; same with Valnet sources. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per above, interviews count as primary. Additionally, could you please cite some of these sources you're referring to? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interviews may count as primary, but depending on the other/surrounding writeup may well count as independent RSes contributing to notability. Jclemens (talk) 07:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the claims of @Jclemens: and @PanagiotisZois:. --Rtkat3 (talk) 23:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters as stated by user:Daranios. Significant coverage only comes from CBR, a questionable source according to WP:VALNET, and the wikis for He-Man MOTU, but these are tertiary sources that either do not cite references or just makes circular references to articles within that wiki. Not notable for a separate article at this time.Prof.PMarini (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God Sent Me[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A self-published autobiography about Selman v. Cobb County School District, with no substantial coverage. Walsh90210 (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Law, Education, Christianity, and Science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the Skeptical Inquirer review is sigcov, so it's untrue that there's none, but if that's it then it would fail notability. It needs at least two. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PARAKANYAA: There's a review in The Atlanta Jewish Times on pg. 34 of this issue. This would normally be enough, but there's an interview with the author directly above the review, so I don't think this would be independent enough to count towards NBOOK. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above, a very weak keep. Without knowing more about that organization's processes, the independence may be up in the air, but they look like a reputable newspaper and strictly speaking I don't think interviewing the author is a sure sign that it's non independent, they could have simply sought it out. But yeah I won't die on this hill PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar Socialist Labour Youth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A branch of a Gibraltar political party fails WP:NORG. No WP:SIGCOV in any WP:SIRS. (A couple of churnalistic sources are available, but as WP:INTERVIEW-based journalism they would be considered primary sources.) Moreover, WP:BRANCH would apply since it's a sub-organization of the GSLP. Sources in the article don't even reference the subject. As an alternative to deletion, I propose to redirect to Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party as was previous done prior to reversion by the creator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flexcon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable business, article created for promotional purposes. -- Beland (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Przemysław Potocki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV for WP:BLPS. In my opinion, its not notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Normanhunter2 (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:ATD is a redirect to Potocki family. Curbon7 (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to his father Antoni Potocki (1780–1850) to which Przemysław's mother also redirects. Oppose redirecting to Potocki family, which I assume is for notable entries (although I see one non-linked entry). Also, neither his father nor son who have standalone pages, have entries in the Potocki family. Jay 💬 00:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Channa torsaensis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source was a predatory journal doi:10.18782/2320-7051.7131 Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep two potential sources in taxonbar, as well as Dey, Nur, Raychowdhury, Sarkar, Singh & Barat, 2018 mentioned in the taxobox. Seems like enough RS without even going to the library.
awkwafaba (📥) 02:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the predatory journal + a database that cites the predatory journal. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect At first blush, the fact that a species has been described in a predatory journal should not be a problem. With taxonomic descriptions, the proof is in the pudding; if the major databases take them on and perpetuate them without comment, then things are usually fine for our purposes (these guys do check, more solidly than we can). However, in this case the assignment is actually considered doubtful. This article suggests synonymy to Channa quinquefasciata (We review recent descriptions of species of the genus Channa and conclude [...] that C. torsaensis is not sufficiently diagnosed from C. quinquefasciata), and Eschmeyer's Catalogue goes with that reading (Current status: Synonym of Channa quinquefasciata Praveenraj, Uma, Knight, Moulitharan, Balasubramanian, Bineesh & Bleher 2018.) This suggests that the article should be redirected to Channa quinquefasciata, which would have to be established as a stub. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I added the word "disputed" to the lede. If the name Channa torsaensis has not been explicitly rejected, perhaps it should be kept until then, and the reference from a predatory journal reinstated. Anyone interested in creating a stub for another species in this genus may want to start with the information in the corresponding page in Wikidata, such as https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q117204868 for Channa quinquefasciata and in WikiSpecies. Also, Ralf Britz, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21341156 the researcher who disputes the name, might be worth creating an article about. See also species:Ralf_Britz Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Elmidae. It looks like the name was initially accepted into FishBase and transferred from there to WoRMS, but currently, searching on Channa in FishBase and clicking on the entry for C. torsaensis gets the message "Species name is not in the public version of FishBase." Eschmeyer's Catalog also synonymizes it with C. quinquefasciata. Since C. torsaensis is not accepted as a distinct species by these taxonomic authorities, I think redirection is appropriate. Choess (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Eagle Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. It's mentioned in a few interviews with Carney, and there's this very short article on Cleveland Scene about it. A possible alternative to deletion is a merge/redirect to Patrick Carney or The Black Keys. toweli (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, United States of America, Ohio, and Tennessee. toweli (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Patrick Carney. Option to keep if more sources are found. Why is this at AfD at all? Chubbles (talk) 16:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Patrick Carney, then delete to prevent restoration. Absolutely fails WP:NCORP. The suggested target is also tarnished by public relations editing activity, so that page needs to be carefully scrutinized for potential GNG fail. Graywalls (talk) 01:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Grand Prix F3 Support Race[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following up on Talk:Australian Grand Prix#Merge proposal, there is support for deletion on the grounds of notability, with no suitable merge target as an alternative to deletion. The results are unreferenced; the single reference is not independent of the topic. Klbrain (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Agreed, no independent notability. Any content worth preserving (I don't think there is any) could be merged to Australian Formula 3. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 17:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete minor support event that hasn't being run for 17 years BFC Aspie (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, 5225C. Other than Macau GP, most third tier races are not notable, including FIA races. Most people but the most ardent fans don't pay attention to it too. SpacedFarmer (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Outlaw[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. [21] is about him ... and contradicts the one fact in the article. I didn't find any other substantial coverage. Walsh90210 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails WP:NBIO, no additional coverage found. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm not sure catching 13 lb fish is what we're looking at for notability. There are some interviews about this person, but those don't help notability, [22], this is typical. Oaktree b (talk) 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Schwinghammer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. No substantial coverage of fishing; no ability to tell if any of the other "Paul Schwinghammer" search results are about the same person; no credible claim that any of his fishing tournament results are important. Walsh90210 (talk) 16:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Minnesota. Walsh90210 (talk) 16:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is not a notable individual, semi-pro angler. No coverage in any sources, reliable or not. What's given now in the article is simple names in a list. The name is rather common and you'll find anything and everything about this person. Not seeing notability as being met. Oaktree b (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kablammo (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Knives Out (film series)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redrafitify as too soon per MOS:FILMSERIES which recommends three films, currently only two have been released for this series with a third planned, it'll be more necessary if the third is released but that's crystal ball. Indagate (talk) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Indagate (talk) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since the third film is in production, so it is across the threshold of being nearly-guaranteed to come out. (In the film industry, until filming starts, the creation of a film is much less certain.) This is why the third film has its own standalone article when it started filming. We'd just be deleting this film series article to bring it back later. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There are two movies released, with the third now in production. This is not at all uncommon to have an article, similar to how the third film has a page (see @Erik:'s comments). DisneyMetalhead (talk) 04:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: If the third movie has a page, then the series can have a page. If you'd like to delete the third movie's page because of WP:CRYSTAL, then go and do that. Toughpigs (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While I agree with Indagate's rationale that this is still too soon and technically against the film series MOS, I see no harm in keeping it up now that it is here. That in mind, @DisneyMetalhead, it is typically best practice to have a talk page discussion at one of the main related articles (ie at Talk:Knives Out) BEFORE submitting these types of drafts for an AfC, as AfC is not always aware of the film MOS guidelines, case in point, what we have here. This article is definitely in need of major ref additions and cleanup throughout, which probably should have been squared away before a move, though those can always be rectified. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Expansion and/or additional refs/details can be added at any point in time. I did not think it would be controversial at all to create a film article about the collective details of the film series as a whole. DisneyMetalhead (talk) 04:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Third film is already in production and has it's own article. Upcoming films incredibly rarely get canned once they've began shooting. If the third film itself can already have an article I see no guideline reason why the film series can not.★Trekker (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cruisers Rock Combo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBAND / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature Yashmagh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small Emirati clothing brand with one retail location - coverage is low quality churnalism/promotional. No evidence of GNG. BrigadierG (talk) 20:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, and United Arab Emirates. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 22:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Chenfeld[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly unnotable. All but one of the sources are about his record company or Kidz Bop. The sole source documenting him is an interview. OhHaiMark (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Law, United States of America, and Ohio. OhHaiMark (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Birel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article only references corporate sources. It does mention a book, but unless this book can be sourced - which it so far has not been. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP for these reasons. Checking the Italian and Swedish versions for sources proved unfruitful, and with the book being prohibitively expensive to fix the reference (which is incorrect on publishing date) it is very difficult to see this being notable. JM 12624 13:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. JM 12624 13:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep here some WP:SIGCOV, mostly in the historical archive of Corriere della Sera, accessible via WP:LIBRARY:

[23] "È Lissone la Maranello dei go-kart campioni del mondo", 30 April 1986 p. 32 (Milan edition)
[24] "In kart alla conquista dell'America", 12 May 1990 p. 45
[25] "È florida in Italia l'industria dei kart", 24 September 1977, p. 17
Coverage of a 2014 merger on Gazzetta dello Sport: [26]
An in-depth review of one of their karts on tkart.it, specialized magazine: [27]

Broc (talk) 08:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I agree based on these sources this seems notable, I don't have WP:LIBRARY access so much appreciated. If no other arguments are put forward this seems to pass WP:GNG JM 12624 13:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Broc. Being a well known brand like the since deleted Tony Kart, has so much potential for notability. WP:ATD would be to draftify. SpacedFarmer (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beachhead Solutions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. However, I found enough sources for PROD to perhaps not be warranted:

brief mention in WSJ

A short mention in a 2006 piece from The Mercury News: Beachhead Solutions in Santa Clara sells a $129-a-year service, Lost Data Destruction, which enables an administrator to send a command to destroy data on a laptop that has been stolen. If the thief tries to hook the laptop up to the Internet, it will send a message to the administrator and trigger the data destruction. – Teratix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and California. – Teratix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 14:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete as article doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Brandon (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shafkat Saeed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. 2 of the 3 sources are primary. And the third source is just routine coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, South Africa, Pakistan, Iran, Kuwait, Belgium, France, and Luxembourg. LibStar (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Yes fails GNG clearly. I did WP:BEFOER and only found some WP:ROTM coverage. Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 14:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

ఐ 20[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. 2 of the 3 sources appear to be copies of each other (I couldn't access the third), and no reliable sources were found online. Does not meet WP:NFILM. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: I have the feeling that this wasn't released on the announced date (14 June), so let's wait for release and reviews. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could the article title instead be the English translation? — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 12:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 14:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the title using another script doesn't help searching; regardless, I can't find mentions of this. The sources are listed as marginal reliability per Cite Highlighter, and I don't see any others we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Barbarian Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Advertising, and Companies. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Torchwood Archive[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough reliable independent coverage - all I've been able to find is self-published blogs posting reviews. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 13:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 13:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Torchwood_(audio_drama_series)#Background: if existing coverage is judged insufficient for a standalone page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Radio, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Torchwood (audio drama series)#Background - The only sources currently in the article are primary, and searches are bringing up only brief mentions in reliable sources. This specific audio drama is already covered in the indicated section, so this should be redirected there. Rorshacma (talk) 02:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Per author's request. – robertsky (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Britton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL}

Reason Cricketer from Jersey therefore non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrug02 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shrug02 you're the only author of this article so if you want it deleted, you can probably use {{Db-author}} on the article itself. Or maybe confirm here since I don't quite understand your deletion rationale. Skynxnex (talk) 13:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Skynxnex Thanks. I just discovered the author option you mentioned. Will use in future. Deletion rational is that several of my other articles on cricketers from Jersey are being deemed non-notable so I figured they all are. Thanks again. Best wishes. Shrug02 (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Jersey. Skynxnex (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Manufactured Music (label)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can be merged to Black Hole Recordings or Manufactured Superstars with little information. The label doesn't show any significant importance for it's own article, neither there are any sources. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 12:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Colorado. Skynxnex (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just put some sources on there earlier. Dogperson160 (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is a new article that is still being worked on, but I see no reason why it shouldn't redirect to Manufactured Superstars. I removed the list of 160 songs from the label as clearly excessive. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just put it back. This wasn’t the only article about a music label to have all of the releases on it. Dogperson160 (talk) 23:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I don't believe any record label article on Wikipedia should list all of their releases – that contravenes WP:NOTDATABASE and isn't what Wikipedia is for. The focus should be on a discussion of the label. Richard3120 (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Manufactured Superstars. Nothing wrong with Wikipedia providing discographical information, which is encyclopedic, but the roster of artists for this label is underwhelming and I don't see a strong case that it needs a separate article from its founding members. Chubbles (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Garvin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

wp:toosoon Notability; has not yet been elected to a post conferring notability. TheLongTone (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Political candidate that doesn't meet WP:NPOL. LibStar (talk) 14:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a political advertising platform. One of multiple candidates from same party created by person with connection to a party pollie. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Rascals (producers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find substantial coverage of the duo or recognition of their work, so no apparent notability by our standards. This should probably be redirected to Leon Thomas III since his article mentions the group multiple times and includes all the same credits. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Leon Thomas III. It turns out that the duo was nominated from a Grammy Award ([28]), though that seems not to have generated significant media coverage. I agree with the nominator that most of their media mentions are in articles about Leon Thomas, while his partner Khris Riddick-Tynes seems not to have done much outside of the partnership. It can all be described at Thomas's article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had a feeling they would have a Grammy nod given the popularity of the artists they work with, but Grammy.com's search function broke recently so I couldn't find it there. Saw that article, but I must've missed the words "Grammy-nominated" in it. Thanks for the catch. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 13:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 12:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Leon Thomas III: I could have said merge but there is not much to merge. The article is majorly sourced from All Music that doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Komarov (businessman)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person is not notable; highly promo article; sources are about companies nor the person; 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person is notable, he meets WP:BIO — he is a CEO of the biggest mobile operator of Ukraine for many years and has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the person. He also has several awards and honours — Head the best leaders ranking according to Forbes Ukraine, Lead Ideal Managers (a ranking of the telecom industry's best executives), he made it into the top 10 executives of Ukraine, top 20 most successful leaders of Ukrainian companies and many others. --Perohanych (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Keep. The page reads pretty much as his personal CV, but there are numerous sources (primarily in Ukrainian) with non-trivial coverage of the person. Probably passes WP:GNG. My very best wishes (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. WP:MILL business person. No WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. No SNGs apply here. C F A 💬 16:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I agree with this. My very best wishes (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Please find some examples of WP:SIGCOV:
1. https://forbes.ua/profile/oleksandr-komarov-369 (1 place among top 25 best СЕО)
2. https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2018/12/6/643323/
3. https://biz.nv.ua/ukr/markets/v-kijivstar-priznachili-novoho-kerivnika-z-beeline-2483354.html
See also 17,000+ results of Google Search in Ukrainian

Komarov is really No 1 business person in Ukraine --Perohanych (talk) 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. My very best wishes (talk) 18:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 12:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the sources are deep enough or independent enough to establish the person's notability. The article's author does not understand what reliable sources are. The page is REFBOMBED and contains only passing, routine mentions. There are no good, reliable sources. Profiles on Forbes are not reliable at all, nor are press releases. --182.53.28.77 (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) please adhere to this guideline and learn how to spot paid or superficial news from deep media coverage 182.53.28.77 (talk) 09:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But mentiones sources are not paid or superficial news! They do contain an in-depth analysis of the person. It is not just a profile on Forbes, it is a profile in connection with the fact that Forbes recognized Komarov as the No. 1 person among businessmen in the whole country! --Perohanych (talk) 13:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terwin (corporation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Terwin corporation doesn't meet NCROP - no reliable independent of the subject sources; advertisement, Spam#Advertisements_masquerading_as_articles 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The corporation is notable, it meets WP:ORGCRIT— it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the corporation. It is one of the biggest corporations in Ukraine with $1,6 billion assets and $1,7 billion revenue (2023). Before the Russian invasion, the revenue exceeded $2 billion. Nowadays, the corporation is building logistics hubs in four regions of Ukraine (Odesa, Lviv, Dnipro, Kyiv) with a total investment of more than $500 million. Of course, this and other activity of the corporation has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. --Perohanych (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If so, share please 3 best sources meeting WP:ORGCRIT 167.86.184.60 (talk) 16:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All of them can be considered as secondary, independent of the subject, and with quite significant coverage of the corporation.

I am not sure if it is an extra argument, but simple Google Search gives 3800+ results --Perohanych (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: per WP:NCORP. There is enough WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Most is in Russian or Ukrainian. See Google news. C F A 💬 16:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 12:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the sources are deep enough or independent enough to establish the company notability per WP:NCORP. The article's author does not understand what reliable sources are. Google News is not a measure of notability. Every source should be analyzed, and I have done this, concluding that all the sources met in the page and here provided by the author, are only superficial mentions or routine announcements with no single source providing in-depth, independent media coverage. --182.53.28.77 (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well. Let's analyse every mentioned source:
1. The text of European Business Association is entirely devoted to Tervin and provides enough about the size of the corporation.
2. This text of Forbes is entirely devoted to Tervin. It contains an in-depth analysis of the corporation's composition, assets and revenue, as well as information about the founders
3. This text of Liga is entirely devoted to Tervin. It contains an in-depth analysis of the corporation's history
4. This text of New Voice is entirely devoted to Tervin. It contains an in-depth analysis of the largest companies that make up the corporation
5. This text of Interfax is entirely devoted to co-operation of Tervin and the state Agency on investments.
All the media are independent. There are much more sources --Perohanych (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating following PROD and refund request. Appears to fail WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Appears to mainly cite primary sources, with none sustaining a claim to notability. Various searches are struggling to turn up anything. Mdann52 (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The company went through a few name changes: first to Peninsula Wireless Communications, and then to Repeater Technologies. The company was taken public and then went bankrupt under the name Repeater Technologies. Peninsula Engineering Solutions is a successor organization, which was acquired by Infinity Wireless. https://www.infinitiwireless.com/we-are-pleased-to-announce-the-merger-of-their-two-companies/

The company's patent on split band filtering was a foundational patent in on frequency repeaters for cellular mobile radio. It is cited by 36 other patents, see: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4783843A/en Rabcfi (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 11:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No sources about the company found, some patents and government decisions. Listed in a paper here [29], but not really about the organization. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TwoTiime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No discography or chart activity, and no third-party independent coverage. Sources are all primary, consisting of promotional interviews, press releases, and subject's hometown publication (Ottawa Citizen). 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 04:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The Ottawa Citzen article was reliable, but there is no widespread coverage in reliable source about this person or their music. No charted songs or notable awards. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I created the article but I'll comment anyways. Meets WP:BASIC. There are at least two in-depth Complex articles ([30] [31]) - Complex is a recommended source at WP:A/S and is independent of the subject. There are many in-depth HipHopCanada articles ([32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]) which are independent of the subject. There are multiple in-depth HotNewHipHop sources ([39] [40] [41] [42] [43] ) - HotNewHipHop is also a recommended source per WP:A/S. This isn't including the many Ottawa Citizen articles which are all independent and reliable, or any of the interviews that add little additional commentary. Doesn't have to meet a SNG if it meets GNG/BASIC. I don't see how this is controversial. C F A 💬 21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another issue is that the article also reads like a promotional piece, with nothing therein showing why he’s actually notable. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 03:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A non-neutral tone is not a reason for deletion, though. It can be fixed through editing. I think it’s pretty clear the subject meets GNG, regardless of any SNGs that might apply. C F A 💬 10:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 11:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion by Clearfrienda that together shows significant coverage to pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A little promo in an article is not a criteria for deletion except of blatant ones. I am sure of the articles presented per se from Complex. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul Tourism Awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable award which effectively serves the purpose of rewarding people who promote tourism in Seoul. The awards don't seem to have any significant coverage in third-party sources aside from trivial mentions and promotional pieces. There are no mainspace pages that link to the article either, apart from List of awards and nominations received by NewJeans. The article has only had a few edits made since its creation 15 years ago, mostly by bots. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Travel and tourism, and South Korea. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because of notability. I encourage you to search for articles about the award in Korean; the award has a ton of non trivial and non (at least it seems like) promotional coverage.

[44][45][46][47]

I can look up more upon request.

Also I'd argue the lack of activity and links is much more secondary to coverage. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lovekesh Kataria[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The existing sources in the article are mostly routine coverage from and related to Bigg Boss OTT (Hindi TV series) season 3 show which makes it a case of BLP1E. Being a contestant on a Bigg Boss show does not inherently make the subject notable. A WP:BEFORE shows that the sources go back to 2023, but they are all related to the same show. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, and India. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Easy Delete due to lack of notability or claim of such — Iadmc ♫^talk 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no sign of notability of any flavour. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira delete! 2403:6200:8851:9199:458:B9EF:9898:F8E9 (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The youtuber's work has not been significant and unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. RangersRus (talk) 14:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG, No in-depth coverage. I have drafted this article earlier also. But the page creator is creating it again and again. (It will be considered as spam) And the page owner has also tampered with my user page. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:BLP1E, not indepedently notable. Ravensfire (talk) 22:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: These sources are only for one event and are not significant enough to establish notability. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG and any other criteria. It appears to be a fan-created article following news coverage of the individual's participation in Bigg Boss. GrabUp - Talk 07:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are no sources to establish notability here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Hairbrain Scheme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NMUSIC, article is built heavily on puffery, and is unsourced. Free Realist 9 (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Free Realist 9 (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find any evidence that this band were popular outside of Santa Barbara – any reviews I find are from local media [48], [49]. As far as I can see, they released one mini-album in 2006 and one full-length album in 2008, both on non-notable labels, before splitting up... Singer Grant Parsons' contact details suggest the band was active until January 2008 [50], I can find social media posts from 2009 saying "I miss this band" and their website was dead by 2011, according to the Wayback Machine. Richard3120 (talk) 15:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not meet Wikipedia's notability, it lacks enough credible information and sources to prove the band's importance.Yakov-kobi (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks ok to delete. Haven't looked very hard but ProQuest yields very few hits when you search for "Harebrain Scheme" and "band". Did find one mention in a 2007 newspaper in Eugene, Oregon, but it's literally just a passing mention about an upcoming gig – so little information, in fact, that it's not entirely clear that it's the same band. Please ping me if sources are found. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is the same band, but they appear to have been the second support act on another band's tour [51], so it doesn't really make them notable. Richard3120 (talk) 12:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Would also point out that the Daily Nexus (referenced above) is a student newspaper so doesn't count toward notability. Cielquiparle (talk) 02:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Foolio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. No indication of awards or charted songs. No notable biographical details prior to his death. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, and Florida. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we don't need every ganga rapper who have been shot dead. Not notable enough — Iadmc ♫^talk 11:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you actually do research you would now he has bean a notable artist in Florida since about 2018 2600:8805:D1B:7500:1322:CAB:414A:D0A0 (talk) 19:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC) - — 2600:8805:D1B:7500:1322:CAB:414A:D0A0 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete: Doesn't pass musical notability; coverage is only about his death. I gave up after 20 pages in Gnews trying to find mentions of him before his passing. Simply not a notable performer. Oaktree b (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Rapper is notable. Particularly within Florida. Jattlife121 (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC. Another no-name rapper whose death has made more headlines than his (non-notable) music. Dead rappers always make headlines no matter how obscure they are. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 22:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this article should be about his death? It got major coverage in many major outlets. Thriley (talk) 22:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Rapper is notable. Particularly within Florida especially in Jacksonville and through the south. He has many notations in different news articles. Foolio is also is featured on Pimp of the Nation album by Natalac Featuring international recording artist sean paul, grammy award winning Project Pat, Three 6 Mafia Member La Chat, Pastor Troy, Ying Yang Twins, Keak da Sneak to name a few who all are very Notable rappers Yameka (talk) 03:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His death is certainly covered but his music and life? We need sources for these.@Yameka — Iadmc ♫^talk 06:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources

https://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/pimp-of-the-nation-a-sensational-new-hiphop-album-by-natalac-to-be-released-on-presidents-day-2192018_184054.html Yameka (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yameka (talk • contribs) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.allmusic.com/album/pimp-of-the-nation-mw0003174654

https://www.allmusic.com/album/pimp-of-the-nation-mw0003174654#credits

https://www.makinitmag.com/updates/natalac/2018/03/djs-says-natalac-pimp-nation-lp-classic-material

https://g.co/kgs/m6zgJcJ

Also there are Radio Edit and Explicit versions released Pimp of the Nation & Pimp of the Nation (Radio Edit)

This project was released Presidents Day 2018 aka feb 19th 2018 in hard copies throughout the south and online on all platforms Yameka (talk) 23:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources Keep

News Article .. First Coast News contacted Jacksonville Rapper Natalac and got his and the sheriff of Jacksonville input on Julio Foolio outcome. Natalac with his decades of experince with Hip Hop & younger rappers he worked with through messages through music.. he chose Foolio for his 11th Studio Album with grammy award winners etc. with their song Bridge This Gap a song to send a positive message. On natalac Pimp of the Nation. going by this article

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbEiSj5yhHA

https://www.firstcoastnews.com/article/news/local/jacksonville-rapper-natalac-experience-with-foolio/77-6c775f01-b3bf-4232-8611-36190b187882 Yameka (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Artist is fails notability guidelines. There's barely any coverage I could find apart from his death. ~~I do think we could have an article about his death like @Thriley suggested, though.~~ DaCrashy (T.C.) 16:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ONEEVENT. --Magnolia677 (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Interesting how all the “keep” votes are repeating the “he’s notable because he’s from Florida” mantra, and verbatim to boot (“Rapper is notable. Particularly within Florida”). Florida does not represent the entire country. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 19:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or indeed the world! — Iadmc ♫^talk 04:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While BIO1E and 1E are extremely important these don't apply here. Wikipedians apply these too much after violent deaths. In a way this makes sense. It's an unusual feature. Still, we should work by policy and guidelines. The keep is by GNG. gidonb (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG. Foolio was the subject of multiple independent coverage even before his death. In 2019, Vulture.com, in reviewing Never Wanted Fame, wrote the mixtape "establishes Foolio as one of the most gripping, irresistible rappers working today." In 2021, Vice credited Foolio, along with Yungeen Ace, as playing a leading role in popularizing rap versions of pop songs. His feuds with other rappers have been covered by Atlanta Black Star [52] among others, and he received significant coverage in a 2021 Complex.com article on the Jacksonville rap community. [53]. Police blotter news articles about his shootings and death can fill in the gaps for a concise, neutral, and fair biography that is fully compliant with all WP policies. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no point in creating an article for someone who was irrelevant as a rapper when alive and a gangster 103.75.195.51 (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sevda Jafarova[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This is a promotional page create by Araz Yaquboglu. There is no nearly enough RS about the subject to establish notability.--Correspondentman (talk) 10:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: It appears {{subst:afd2}} was not fully implemented here; I have fixed this. No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Medicine, and Azerbaijan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is no any, even a slightest sign of notability. Just a couple of links to local press or websites, two of which are dead links. My very best wishes (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paulius Stankevicius[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance. I have a degree, I founded a small consultancy, I wrote some articles, I wrote a book. BrigadierG (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Advertising, Hong Kong, and Lithuania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marek Švec (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article of this men's footballer has not received enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG.

The only secondary source I could find is SME's sub-website My Nitra. It mentions Marek Švec scoring a goal in one paragraph after translation: "The oldest and the youngest players scored a valuable draw. Anton Sloboda was everywhere, and we could see the 34-year-old fighter passing between the stoppers in the back, serving teammates in the middle and setting up a goal for the teenager Marek Švec in the front. The academy graduate scored his third goal, no one under the age of 18 in the top 30 European leagues has scored more in a season... Wow! The youngest debutant in the history of FC ViOn will celebrate adulthood only on New Year's Eve and has already made 22 league starts with five goals." The coverage of Švec is written in bold, but something tells me that the rest are more of a trivial mention.

If this article gets deleted, we should consider moving "Marek Švec (wrestler)" to just "Marek Švec".

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to have made appearances in the top division of Slovakia which surely meets WP:NFOOTY BFC Aspie (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. NFOOTY doesn't exist anymore, but that notwithstanding, I would add to those this one: [54] which contributes very well to GNG. Geschichte (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I believe the sources mentioned in this discussion go towards the notability criteria. I also found [55] which seems to be connected to the TASR and covers his loan to Spartak Myjava in a fairly deep manner. C 679 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Decent career, decent coverage. Anwegmann (talk) 00:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Florrie Copley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, who fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG. Article is just full of WP:REFBOMBS, with none of them contributing towards significant coverage about the player. That's what you can find at a simple search- [56] Robo^Cric Let's chat 10:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Cricket, and Jersey. Robo^Cric Let's chat 10:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm no expert, but Jersey is an associate member country so it seems she meets the following criteria from WP:OFFICIALCRICKET:

“

Twenty20 Internationals (T20Is), all men's matches from 2005–2019 and all women's matches since 2004–June 2018. Then all T20Is for Full Member countries and T20Is for Associate member countries in a World T20 (men's and women's) or ICC Global Qualifier (men's and women's).

”

@Curb Safe Charmer: Firstly, the mentioned player hasn't yet played in a global T20 WC qualifier. Secondly, WP:OFFCRIC just states that players participating in these matches may have sufficient coverage about them to justify an article, but it should not be assumed to exist without further proof. According to WP:NCRIC, as she has not played for a Test-playing nation, this criterion also fails. And the only other way is GNG, which is also not satisfied. Robo^Cric Let's chat 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so 2023 ICC Women's T20 World Cup Europe Qualifier isn't a global T20 WC qualifier? My mistake. I will leave this one to the experts! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The qualifier mentioned is the European stage of the qualifying process for the global World Cup. Shrug02 (talk) 11:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer Forgot to tag in my reply. Still new to this! Apologies. Shrug02 (talk) 11:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer 2024 ICC Women's T20 World Cup Qualifier- This is what global qualifier means. Thanks. Robo^Cric Let's chat 12:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RoboCric so you're conceding she has played in a global qualifier now? Shrug02 (talk) 13:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrug02 No, she has played in 2023 ICC Women's T20 World Cup Europe Qualifier not the global qualifier. You first need to understand how a World Cup qualification works. Anyway, Global qualifier is not an issue here. He still fails WP:GNG and point1#WP:NCRIC. Robo^Cric Let's chat 14:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RoboCric He? The subject is a woman. Glad to know you read it carefully Shrug02 (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrug02 Are you raising doubts that I've not reviewed it properly. An English error on He/She cannot prove that I did not do a WP:BEFORE. In the previous sentence, I did use "She". And you know mistakes happen. Robo^Cric Let's chat 14:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I really don't care any more. As I stated below I've db-author requested all my Jersey cricket articles be deleted. Have a good day and enjoy being a reviewer.~~ Shrug02 (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~All deleted now, except the couple that are subject to AFD, so you can be safe in the knowledge that yet more trivial stuff to do with small countries has been expunged @RoboCric~~ Shrug02 (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Florrie Copley is notable as she is one of only 2 players to play in the inaugural women's inter-insular cup and Jersey's first women's T20 international (a match in which she top scored). She has played in a world cup qualifying tournament taking wickets in both matches she played in. This is all backed up by citations from the BBC and Jersey Evening Post among others. There is limited scoop for sources for Jersey and even more so for women's sport in Jersey. It is not like the USA or India where there are hundreds of media organisations. Florrie Copley is a notable figure for cricket and women's sport in general in Jersey and the wider Channel Islands. Shrug02 (talk) 11:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete @RoboCric I withdraw my objections. Articles about obscure cricket grounds in India that only have 2 citations and high school athletes in America are far more important and worthy of space on here. I have requested deletion of all my Jersey cricket articles including the ones about the world's youngest international cricketer and only player to score a WT20I 50 batting at number 8 and the one about a 17-year-old left arm spinner who just made his T20 debut and will be probably one of the leading associate wicket takers of all time by the time he retires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrug02 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject to meet the WP:GNG. I would support a redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers to preserve the history, but this does not seem to be the preferred outcome by others. JTtheOG (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers#Florrie Copley, where the content has now been added. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested by @BeanieFan11 above. Shrug02 (talk)
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers#Florrie Copley: The current sources are match statistics or routine reports and do not lend the subject to warrant a standalone article. Redirect as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ramil Hashimli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This is a promotional page create by Atakhanli (the user was blocked-the reason for the blocking was noted that the editor was engaged in paid activities.). There is no nearly enough RS about the subject to establish notability.--Correspondentman (talk) 09:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The {{subst:afd2}} formatting was not fully implemented here; I have fixed this. No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, Medicine, and Azerbaijan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see anything here that would satisfy WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR, or WP:GNG. Qflib (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Molloy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced rugby BLP. All I found were transactional announcements (1, 2, 3) and a routine injury update (1). There seem to be multiple redirect candidates (List of Wakefield Trinity players, List of Salford Red Devils players). JTtheOG (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby league, and England. JTtheOG (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Some non-routine coverage here. I'm a bit surprised I couldn't find more for someone who made nearly 50 Super League appearances. Perhaps someone can add more using offline sources, as a lot of websites unfortunately haven't kept archives during the time period he played in. J Mo 101 (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently soured in my opinion. Mn1548 (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 21:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There seem to be a few articles with more than trivial mention. Given the time period, I also suspect there may be additional sources out there that are not reflected by internet sources. At least weak support for keeping. – notwally (talk) 23:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Baffled at the assertions of SIGCOV here. The source linked above is 229 words, of which all but ~5 sentences are direct quotes. The remainder include a couple sentences summarizing what he says in a quote (not independent analysis) and/or relating "what he feels" (ditto), e.g. But after a lengthy time rehabilitating, Molloy is now over the worst of it. and The young forward is hoping to push on and make a big impression with the Giants. With last season almost being forgotten about, Molloy now can set out some targets to work towards – and again it may also involve going out on loan., both of which are immediately followed by more detailed quotes from him. Essentially the only secondary independent coverage is a single sentence mentioning he missed a season due to injury. Nowhere near IRS SIGCOV. This is also a British player from the 2010s, well into the internet news era in a country with highly accessible digital media, so I am very skeptical of claims that coverage exists offline somewhere. JoelleJay (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Wakefield Trinity players: Thorough source analysis by JoelleJay removes the basis for standalone notability. Owen× ☎ 12:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Strong sources to support the importance of that person. Normanhunter2 (talk) 15:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Normanhunter2, which material do you believe is non-routine SIGCOV in IRS sources? JoelleJay (talk) 20:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My stance on the potential deletion of this article is that it should be retained, primarily due to the credibility of the 9 sources supporting it. These sources, I believe, are robust enough to establish the article's notability.

Some users here may have stronger opinions based on the WP:SIGCOV of this article, but I see potential for improvement. A 'weak keep' is possible for me because this is a notable topic, and there are likely more substantial sources waiting to be added to enhance the article. Normanhunter2 (talk) 23:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Wakefield Trinity players. Lack of SIGCOV per JoelleJay’s source analysis. This is the better of the two proposed redirect targets as the subject played most of his career with this club. Frank Anchor 18:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Al-Jumah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find out if this person, a Saudi author is notable as per WP:GNG. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 08:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, Travel and tourism, and Saudi Arabia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dapdap[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar issue as to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cansolabao, Samar and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirang Lupa (2nd nomination). The only source here ([57]) mainly speaks of a landmark in the barangay, and does not thoroughly discuss the barangay itself. Possible failure to comply WP:GEOLAND. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tarangnan § Barangays, restoring current content when better sources are found. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 09:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tarangnan § Barangays per WP:ATD --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambivu 3D Workstation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. toweli (talk) 08:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. toweli (talk) 08:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree that this fails WP: GNG. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of battles in Kinmen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similarly to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of battles in Penghu, I don't see the reason why this would be its own article, as opposed to the conflicts being covered in the Kinmen article (where they are already covered). toweli (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Lists, China, and Taiwan. toweli (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with nom. WP:SALAT and WP:NOTDIRECTORY per previous discussion. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 10:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with nom. Unneeded content fork, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Kierzek (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as a sort of set index page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No need of this index. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 11:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Helms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICIAN. No sources to speak of. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nolan McGuire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion would be a redirect, but I'm not sure what would be the best target. toweli (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, United States of America, and Illinois. toweli (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jats in Rajasthan politics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary glorification of caste. See WP:FANCRUFT. None of the cited sources give any importance to the caste. There is also blatant violation of BLPs across this article because as per WP:CASTEID it is necessary for the subject to state their caste in their own words. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lead of this article promotes this caste and fails to meet encyclopedic standards and other information violates BLP policy per WP:CASTEID. Based on the current content of the article, it appears that the intention behind creating this article was solely to glorify a particular caste. This is not the first time TheSlumPanda has done this; they have previously promoted caste here. Looking at their editing history, it seems they have mainly focused on caste-related articles. I am worried they might not be familiar with WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:GSCASTE. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've notified them of WP:GSCASTE and WP:ARBIPA. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Nanda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The sources available in the article only appear as simple mentions, which is not enough to demonstrate notability. And the history of contributions to the article assumes a WP:COI. Ciudatul (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Ciudatul (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Skabelkin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person is not notable; sources are about companies or projects. Many facts are just there with completely zero sources 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Cryptocurrency, Finance, Russia, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HLSW[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. toweli (talk) 06:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software. toweli (talk) 06:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage to be found. Charcoal feather (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I too, couldn't find any sigcov on the topic from reliable sources. MK at your service. 11:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heartland Museum of Military Vehicles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Military, Transportation, and Nebraska. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if this does somehow survive deletion I am able to get some photos for the article. I haven't looked much into the Museum itself so I can't currently comment on it's notability. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 04:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is not written like an advertisement, instead it needs improvement, not deletion. I'm appalled to see this nomiated for deletion. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I spent a little bit of time tonight cleaning up, updating references, adding a new reference to a 2016 article in Recoil (magazine). We need some help from a wordsmith to expand the text. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, I've found some sourcing. Cleanup is possible, not a reason to delete. This is nowhere near TNT level. Star Mississippi 14:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This page need to be rewritten to not be like an advertisement, but there are some articles online about the museum that make it notable. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 17:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Apart from being written like an advertisement (WP:NORG), this entry fails WP:GNG. Its only sources are its own website. AstridMitch (talk) 03:58, 19 June 2024

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Could be notable, but sourcing is primary in the article. I can only find various travel blogs or listings for them [58], without much coverage at all. Oaktree b (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per reasonable coverage in books and news sources. gidonb (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disagreement here among editors on the quality of the sourcing in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enhanced network selection[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Not clear what the topic really means outside of GSM, not clear that sources exist to show notability JMWt (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to GSM I guess? Seems like an obscure and obsolete feature of old cellular phones used by one particular network during a transition period? I guess Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and could cover a topic this obscure, if there were appropriate references, but there don't seem to be. I just see forum posts and patent applications (which are highly technical and don't explain the term, and are primary sources we wouldn't generally use anyway). --Here2rewrite (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a generic term. The article is unsourced, and was presumably written based on a single-source: a description in a c.2005 manual about the GSM protocol. Walsh90210 (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Kendrick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this previously unreferenced article about an actor (also known as Adamo Palladino), and added two sources. One is a passing mention and the other is an interview with a family member in the local paper. I don't believe he meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, Television, United Kingdom, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blue, White and Red Rally[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On fr wiki, it just a redirect, on pl wiki, an AfD is ongoing. BEFORE shows very little, as does the article itself. Seems that this organization was either short lived or did not achieve much outside generating a little media buzz when it was founded. I don't see what makes it meet WP:GNG - perhaps it should redirect Jean-Marie Le Pen, as is done on fr wiki? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and France. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am finding some French sources that appear to be about the party or its creation, (Le Journal de Dimanche, ici, RFI, Le Monde, Atlantico, L'express), but my ability to search more contextually is limited by my weak French, as "Bleu Blanc Rouge" is also used to name the French flag. Someone with French knowledge might want to dig into this, because there may well be sources there. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Singara Chennai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable reviews or other sources other than a single production source. A search in Sify ([59]), Chennai Online ([60]), and BizHat ([61]) proves futile. Please find the Kalki and Cine South reviews or redirect to Chennai as all online sources prove to be a description for the city. A WP:BEFORE found a fleeting mention here (சிங்கார சென்னை). DareshMohan (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chennai: Per nom. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Kalabhavan_Mani#Tamil_films. Poor sources with no significant coverage and reliable critic reviews. RangersRus (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I, the nominator, withdraw, my nomination in light of a new production source. Thanks @Srivin:. DareshMohan (talk) 14:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Ravanusa explosion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a news story. All sources are news sources and it did not have any major societal ramifications to meet WP:NEVENT. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Italy. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is further coverage on the Italian article, but if that's enough to pass NEVENT, I'm not sure. PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I genuinely don't remember what I was looking at here, did my brain make up sources? Doesn't pass nevent. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian River Area Chamber of Commerce[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 03:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found some local media coverage, including an article about the visitor center that the chamber operates as well as one about the firing of the chamber's CEO. That may not be enoughm, though. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC) As an alternative to deletion, this could be moved into Sebastian, Florida or Indian River County, Florida. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Florida. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already deleted‎ by @Bbb23: as a G5. Closing as moot. Star Mississippi 20:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle Eye Home Care[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP. Sourced to advertorials. KH-1 (talk) 01:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 01:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Health and fitness, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination does not appear to meet criteria of WP:NCORP GuyBanks (talk) 02:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't have enough independent, reliable sources to prove its importance Yakov-kobi (talk) 11:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: appears to be lifted directly from their LinkedIn profile. Pure PROMO with no coverage outside of PR items. Oaktree b (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

2023 Women's Asian Hockey5s World Cup Qualifier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Sources do not provide independent WP:SIGCOV. Unable to locate sources. Bgv. (talk) 01:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Asia, and Oman. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep international competition to qualify for worldwide tournament. Would it be more acceptable if it was labeled a "cup" or "championship", which is what it is? 2022 Men's EuroHockey5s Championship also has the governing body (International Hockey Federation) as the only reference, which can be typical on lesser known sports.

Tbennert (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Why is only this tournament nominated? That makes no sense with other regional qualifying tournaments being notable. And men's tournaments also being notable. Yes, it can do with more independent sources but qualifying tournaments are part of the international cycle for global tournaments. The Banner talk 16:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell Waite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage, there is none in the article, and it reads like an advertisement. A PROD was contested in 2013. SL93 (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Computing, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ per nom; too promotional and too much unsourced content. Walsh90210 (talk) 02:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on the sources shown by SouthernNights, my first preference would be to redirect/repurpose the article to be about The Waite Group. The notability is entirely based on the books published, but there is probably enough coverage. (If there are sources that aren't contemporaneous trade magazines, I will strike my vote.) Walsh90210 (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to look for recent coverage, but there are so many hits about books I couldn't tell. Which is sufficient evidence this shouldn't be deleted. It needs cleanup, (and with the existing sources might need to be repurposed to be about the publishing firm), but shouldn't be deleted outright. Walsh90210 (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not seem to meet notability standards of WP:AUTHOR GuyBanks (talk) 02:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Very PROMO. I can only find places to buy his books, no reviews... Nothing about this individual either, no mentions in RS. delete for lack of sourcing Oaktree b (talk) 03:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yes, the article needs a rewrite and citations. However, it turns out this guy was a big deal in 1970s and '80s computing. A search in the Wikipedia Library turned up a few reviews of his work in a places such as SciTech Book News and BioScience, along with this article in the New York Times covering some his work (link) and this article from another newspaper where Waite discusses his memories of Steve Jobs. However, where I was truly overwhelmed with citations supporting this person's notability was in a search in the Internet Archive. Turns out his work was heavily covered in computer magazines and journals of the 1970s and '80s, with that search returning over a thousand results. Yes, some the results are ads for his books but there are also what appear to be hundreds of reviews or mentions of his books in Compute!, Byte Magazine, Creative Computing, and many other publications. For examples of these reviews, see the following links: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Please note there are many more reviews, so I'm not attempting to link to all of them. As another example of his notability, the June 1986 issue of Amstrad Computer User states that "The de facto references in this sphere are the works of one Mitchell Waite who, with a crew of collaborators made writing CP/M hooks a one-man industry in the CP/M heyday around 1980." ("Mitchell+Waite" link). Based on all these reviews of his work, I believe the subject meets the notability guidelines at WP:Author. --SouthernNights (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have definitely shown notability. I wish I could withdraw this, but I can't with three prior deletes. SL93 (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurt Hardy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability standards of WP:CRIME GuyBanks (talk) 01:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, History, and Missouri. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find pictures of this person and newspapers describing his trial and hanging from the time... I don't see much notability as there has been no discussion about this person since. Lack of sourcing other than news reports of the event don't help. Oaktree b (talk) 03:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly leaning towards Delete. As the person who updated this article (as it was only one sentence before my update), I don't want to take a strong opinion either way; I just want to contribute my two cents and any helpful background I know.

Checking the notability standards, the word "Generally" ("Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role") seems to offer quite a bit of leeway in terms of what can be included. There are quite a few crime articles throughout Wikipedia that I would say cover crimes/criminals that are even less historically significant than Hurt Hardy, yet those articles have not been questioned.

However, the article is an orphan, and I legitimately cannot think of a single article where it would be appropriate to link to Hurt Hardy. (The only one I might consider would be Rainey Bethea, as the ACTUAL final public execution in the U.S., because there could possibly be a mention on his page that Hurt Hardy's execution is sometimes erroneously given that title despite the fact that it isn't true. Even then, I really don't think Hurt Hardy is notable enough to warrant that.)

I did find one modern source discussing Hurt Hardy - https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/readers-opinion/guest-commentary/article248407885.html (published January 11, 2021) – but one article isn't evidence of sustained coverage. Also, the article only briefly mentions him, and his mention is factually incorrect in several ways. Given the contextual text around that brief mention of Hurt Hardy, the article seems to be implying that Hardy was black, and there may have been an extrajudicial aspect to his public execution; however, Hardy was white, and his hanging was legal and carried out in private.

The relevant text is quoted here: "America’s history of public displays of racially-motivated mob violence is foundational going back to slavery, and public executions as a means of punishment happened well into the 1930s. One of the last public executions in the U.S. was on Missouri soil — the hanging of Hurt Hardy Jr. in 1937. Black people’s public hangings did not involve due process and were viewed as celebratory spectacles attended by thousands of white people, including public officials. People would advertise these “events,” sell food, print postcards of mutilated Black lynching victims, and take pieces of the victims’ bodies and clothing as souvenirs. When looking geographically at Missouri’s lynchings, we see that counties with historic racial terror lynchings are more likely to seek death sentences today."

I also found a 1947 magazine article discussing the murder he committed and his execution, but it is very sensationalized and reads like a detective magazine, and those are notorious for embellishing facts. Afddiary (talk) 12:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vii[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides a single Engadget review (the "Wii vs. Vii First Shot" source), the sources appear to either be unreliable (such as GoNintendo) or trivial mentions such as minor announcements/mentions, making it fail WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Technology. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, no substantial coverage. The Banner talk 15:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wii with further discussion of knockoff Wii consoles based on these sources: [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to VII as {{R from other capitalisation}}. Charcoal feather (talk) 01:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it's redirected it will have to be moved to Vii (console) beforehand. A new redirect at this name can be created if necessary (though it's not actually necessary) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mira-Bhayander, Vasai-Virar Police[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected, contested draft. Moved back against advice of HD. There is no indication they meet N:ORG. A merger would be fine, but would likely need protected. Star Mississippi 00:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, India, and Maharashtra. Star Mississippi 00:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify then salt the page until notability enough referenced. -Lemonaka 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor sources that talk about inauguration, appointments and organization structure and most of these sources are from the organization's own website. There is no significant indepth coverage in secondary independent sources. Per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations. Fails WP:NORG. RangersRus (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Point to note that, out of 11 almost 6 references are from different news articles, and rest which is there referenced is the actual information, which is true and not for promotion by the website... Pls review again the page references & visit those references Pratik.S2005 (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the website is a government law enforcement website. Pratik.S2005 (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6 sites are the police stations own website mbvv.mahapolice.gov.in and 1 another government source has nothing but a link to this police station site. So these are all unreliable and not secondary independent sources. 4 others news site have nothing significant that satisfies notability. It does not have any criteria to pass the notability guidelines for organizations. RangersRus (talk) 22:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, just to correct, it's an article for Police Commissionerate just like Mumbai Police & not a Police Station... Pratik.S2005 (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is requested to review the topic, it is well notable as per the guideline for notability by the Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratik.S2005 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]