Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locopops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel 04:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Locopops

Organizations that are local in scope are not usually notable per WP:ORG, I do not think that this article has sufficiently established notability. FisherQueen (Talk) 02:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedily. Local company, not notable. Reads like advert.—Gaff ^ταλκ 02:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but correct a couple NPOV problems. GrooveDog 02:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes, this article has neutrality problems, but it satisfies the primary WP:ORG criterion of being the subject of secondary sources. Hut 8.5 06:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reads like a total advert written by the owners themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.67.11 (talk • contribs)
Keep. The article could use a rewrite, but the sources are a good indicator that the subject is notable enough. RFerreira 08:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage appears to be essentially trivial restauront reviews of the kind rutinely carried in newspapers and thus does not establish encyclopedic notability. Eluchil404 18:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Local business that has only been in existence for 2 years. Article primarily written by two SPA's, parts read live an advert ("Locopops does cater and can also be reached by email at [email protected]"). Fails WP:CORP. Caknuck 00:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:CORP doesn't list who created the article or the current tone as criteria... it just calls for existence of non-trivial sources. And they seem to exist here. See also [1] --W.marsh 12:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spam--Mike18xx 09:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 16:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Favorable restaurant reviews don't establish encyclopedic notability. — Scientizzle 00:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.