Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LocoRoco (series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LocoRoco (series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary fork of LocoRoco. The first paragraph is copied near-verbatim from said article, the second paragraph is pure WP:CRUFT. That leaves the table, which ought to be moved back to LocoRoco#Sequels and spin-offs where it belongs. Laun chba ller 12:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds more of a case for merging or redirecting than outright deletion.--77.44.45.52 (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It seems to be almost entirely duplicate content, with no real potential for expansion without using even more duplicate content.There's really nothing of value to merge back into the main article.- Mr X 17:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - uber-redundant, there's a pretty useful Template:LocoRoco for the series. Maybe, at most, redirect to that. LuigiToeness (talk) 06:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.