Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Localizing the SDGs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Localizing the SDGs[edit]

Localizing the SDGs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be purely an essay rather than an article. Nick Number (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Despite the large list of citations, there is very little in terms of reliable sources independent of the subject of the article. The content is also unencyclopaedic, to the point that the page would require a full re-write before being suitable for display here. I think that the useful content could be salvaged and placed in a section on the Sustainable Development Goals article. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is not an encyclopedia article and appears as more of an essay. If there is any content worth saving, pop it into Sustainable Development Goals. Also, AnnaEstrada, please be aware of WP:CANVASS, per your user talk page posts. I don't see anything egregious, but it is worth being aware of the guideline. !dave 17:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.