Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locale of Muscat, Oman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Locale of Muscat, Oman[edit]
- Locale of Muscat, Oman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apparently an article about a church in Oman. No claim of notability and no references killing sparrows 07:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless notability can be asserted. Thanks, Navou banter / contribs 07:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cautious keep. There can't be that many churches in Oman. Though to be sure, the ministry of information site says that there are. StAnselm 12:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ORG. This article appears to be about a local church in an international denomination, yet I can't find any article about the international denomination in Wikipedia. The only source provided is to a web site about the denomination, which doesn't appear to show a directory of its local churches, so it doesn't help confirm the existence of this local church. There is no clear claim to notability in this article, and merely being a church in a mostly Muslim country is not an inherent claim to notability. --Metropolitan90 17:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, it's here: Members Church of God International. It's based in the Phillipines, and I imagine the church in Oman is mostly attended by Filipino workers. StAnselm 23:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I've added a reference to the main article about the international denomination to this article. The rest of my recommendation remains as is. --Metropolitan90 07:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- I definitly do not see how this church claims notability.--Joebengo 18:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Mukadderat 17:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If enough attributable information exists about the subject to write a full and comprehensive article about it, it may make sense for the subject to have its own article. If some source material is available, but is insufficient for a comprehensive article, it is better to mention the subject under the article for its parent locality. If no source material, or only directory-type information (location, function, name, address) can be provided, the subject may not merit mention yet at all. Jerry 22:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.