Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobster Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lobster Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability failure. music/band notability #5 is not a consensus approved method of evaluating record label business category and preliminary before AfD check revealed a mention level coverage in LA Times and inclusion in directory entries in books showing that this is a PO BOX based business. Fails WP:SIGCOV Graywalls (talk) 00:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Entertainment, Business, Companies, and California. Graywalls (talk) 00:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As stated in another AfD, NMUSIC5 applies to performers, not labels. I cannot find anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as the history behind the label may be notable with not online sources possible available. --BoraVoro (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.