Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loïc Dachary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loïc Dachary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established Dachary (talk) 20:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating deletion discussion for Loïc Dachary

  • delete. Reason: WP:SPIP and WP:SIGCOV. The page specifically lacks "significant coverage" and is not "independent of the subject". The page for this person was deleted on French Wikipedia for lack of notability. In fact, the French page was created and "maintained" by Loïc Dachary himself, aka heavy self promotion. The English WP entry at least was created by another person, however Dachary has regularly edited and added his projects on the page and used it like his personal CV. Most of these projects are not of significant notability that would distinguish him from other (free) software developers/advocates. On top of that, the majority of the references in the page are self-referential and link to pages/projects he has created himself. --Erdpferd (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have in the past edited this page a number of times to cut out the most significant bits of self promotion and I'm happy he has himself now added his page to the deletion roster after the French page was taken down. Erdpferd (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.