Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llamas with Hats (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Llamas with Hats[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entire page uses only primary sources (mostly to the YouTube videos themselves). There's absolutely nothing to indicate notability, and the page would essentially need to be rewritten from scratch to be halfway decent. Di (they-them) (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Internet. Di (they-them) (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: We had about a dozen sources in the last AfD when it was a !keep. Same sources this time, plus this one [1]. I don't see what's changed in the last few years, when we identified enough sources last time. Oaktree b (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The Irish Times piece on the page, and existing sources (some identified during the last Afd) prove it is notable. I don't understand the reason for this 2nd nomination. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.