Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizbeth Rodríguez
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nobody contests Missvain's sources. Sandstein 21:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lizbeth Rodríguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable actress who falls short of WP:NACTOR & generally does not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources as per WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets general notability guidelines. She has been profiled in major Spanish language media. Significant cover includes
- "Lizbeth Rodriguez, la chica Badabun que "desnuda" infieles" from El Universal (in article)
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez presenta a su hijo ante las cámaras" from Milenio (in article)
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez, de ventas por catálogo a 'Exponiendo infieles'" from Milenio (in article)
- "¿Quién es Lizbeth Rodríguez? Fotos de Instagram, historia y edad de la 'Chica Badabun' de "Exponiendo infieles"" from El Comerico (in article)
- "Lizbeth Rodriguez hablara en Facebook sobre casos de abuso" from El Universal
- "Fotos Lizbeth Rodríguez sin ropa interior se convierte en una atrevida princesa" from Show! which is El Debate's entertainment magazine
- Passing mentions and when she is cited as a subject matter expert that establishes WP:BASIC
- "La confesión que Lizbeth Rodríguez le hizo a su ex pareja, Tavo Betancourt" from Infobae
- "https://www.elimparcial.com/espectaculos/Tremendo-Lizbeth-Rodriguez-revela-que-ya-no-va-a-exponer-infieles-20200122-0164.html" from El Imparcial
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez, la ex "chica Badabun”, confesó que su papá abusaba de ella" from Infobae
- "Qué es Badabun, el canal mexicano que ha desbancado a ElRubius en YouTube" from El País (in article)
- "Por que a exposição pública de infiéis causa obsessão em tanta gente" fro El País (in article)
- "Youtuber Lizbeth Rodríguez hace lo impensable en nuevo video tras salida de Badabun" from El Diario La Prensa
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez, youtuber de Badabun, paga fuerte deuda a Coppel" from Milenio
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez de Badabun confiesa lo que Tavo Betancourt le pidió" from Chispa, El Debate's lifestyle website
- "Lizbeth Rodríguez de Badabun y la indirecta a Tavo Betancourt" from Chispa
- There are so many articles I could go on and on! Missvain (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment More sources should be added to the page--Chartwind (talk) 00:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Given her huge following of fans, I believe she passes WP:GNG and the second criterion of WP:NACTOR. And I agree with Chartwind that more of the sources provided here should be added to the article. (I have also edited the article's text to fix pronouns and sentence structure, as the article seemed to have been written by someone for whom English isn't their mother tongue.) Dflaw4 (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.