Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizbeth Rodríguez

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nobody contests Missvain's sources. Sandstein 21:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lizbeth Rodríguez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Lizbeth Rodríguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress who falls short of WP:NACTOR & generally does not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources as per WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Meets general notability guidelines. She has been profiled in major Spanish language media. Significant cover includes
Passing mentions and when she is cited as a subject matter expert that establishes WP:BASIC
There are so many articles I could go on and on! Missvain (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment More sources should be added to the page--Chartwind (talk) 00:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Given her huge following of fans, I believe she passes WP:GNG and the second criterion of WP:NACTOR. And I agree with Chartwind that more of the sources provided here should be added to the article. (I have also edited the article's text to fix pronouns and sentence structure, as the article seemed to have been written by someone for whom English isn't their mother tongue.) Dflaw4 (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lizbeth_Rodríguez&oldid=938383960"