Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liveclicker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Liveclicker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject appears to be a non-notable software company. The article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and I don't see where this makes a minimal claim to importance. Another software company in the Video Commerce software industry. Note how they capitalized "Video Commerce" so you can tell it's important. They have a "flagship product". They're sure to make friends with a video e-mail solution that allows the embedding of video into e-mail marketing campaigns. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep', I am the creator of this article and I have already cited in the article several independent 3rd party articles that have pertained to Liveclicker. This Internet Retailer Article cites Liveclicker's work with Advance Auto Parts - a Fortune 500 Company. This article cites our work with Kiddicare.com (owned by Morrisons) as does this one. This article cites our work with Beauty.com and Drugstore.com. We are featured in this article by Website Magazine. We are mentioned multiple times in this analyst report by Forrester (a top research firm). Liveclicker's video email capabilities are discussed here on EmailResponsibly.com. And here is one more mention of Liveclicker on MediaPost. I hope this provides sufficent 3rd party references to classify Liveclicker as "notable" but I am happy to provide additional references if needed. -Nick Wheatley —Preceding undated comment added 00:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Neither analyst reports, nor coverage in small, trade-only readership blogs like "Internet Retailer" or "Website Magazine" really count towards notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Retailer is not just a blog. It operates a monthly magazine, two web sites, two e-mail newsletters, three annual conferences and trade shows, and five research guides. It is essentially the Fortune 500 of the e-commerce world. -Nick Wheatley —Preceding undated comment added 23:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Delete as non-notable and as per Smerdis. The references are rehashed press releases that at most prove existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, existence doesn't imply notability. --Ifnord (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.