Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Witch Parfait

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little Witch Parfait

The game itself hardly seems to be notable as per WP:NOTE. Google hits are kind of sparse and mostly trying to sell me some sort of PVC figurine. This article, along with others related to the game series, also seem largely extraneous. After all, it seems completely senseless for a "stub-class" article to have its own entire category, all related to topics within that of the main article.

Also, they all seem to be edited virtually entirely by a single person, and there is no establishment of notability except for one unsourced statement regarding its success in China/Korea.

These articles have been around for a little while now, and nobody with interest in the subject seems to want to fix them up, so the most sensible thing to do at this point would be to delete them, in my opinion. A merge would make more sense to me, but even the main article seems kind of flimsy with regards to Wikipedia guidelines and policy. G-Flex (talk) 02:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 地炎風水闇陽 ^(Talk) 02:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the other pages which I am nominating, along with this one, as per my original statement:

G-Flex (talk) 02:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all There may well be sources that aren't in English, but I can't find anything notable about any of this. I'd be happy to change if anyone can find sources, but I'm pulling up a blank. Hobit (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. No sources to indicate notability for any of them. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.