Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Road Chapel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Little Road Chapel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG or whatever other notability guidelines users want to pull out of the magician's hat. Ironholds (talk) 03:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable chapel. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete While this would be a delightful subject for the local historical society, I'm afraid it does not meet notability requirements. I was unable to locate significant 3rd party coverage. Dloh cierekim 15:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most churches aren't notable and most businesses aren't either. Neither the original church, nor the modern chapel fit the criterion for notability. St Anselm (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a notable building, and it seems to be more of a disguised advertisment for a wedding chapel business. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.