Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Fresh Meat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The neologism/phenomenon question needs to be hashed out on the talkpage. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Little Fresh Meat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article feels like a WP:COATRACK for a Chinese neologism (xiaoxianrou) with multiple translations. The more general topic is of young male celebrities in China; a rename may be appropriate if there's no existing page on that topic. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 13:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources[1][2][3][4][5] about the phrase "Little Fresh Meat" but the article should be re-written to be mostly about the phrase, not the general topic of young male celebrities. — Za wl 13:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion as to keeping or deleting, but must point out, because this is an encyclopedia rather than a dictionary, an article should be about its general topic rather than the phrase used to name it. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The English language sources that Zawl has found show that the topic is notable. There is a strong presumption that many more source exist in Chinese. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is almost certainly going to be kept, but some clarity as to whether it should be about the phenomenon or the neologism would be appreciated. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.