Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithuania–Slovakia relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Closing per unanimous consensus. — Aitias // discussion 01:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuania–Slovakia relations

Lithuania doesn't have an embassy in Slovakia. lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations, mainly multilateral (esp as both are recent EU members) [1]. A Slovak business delegation visited Lithuania in 1997 but not much else has happened since then. LibStar (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Because there are no independent, secondary sources that directly discusses these countries' bilateral relations in any kind of detail, this topic fail WP:GNG and Wikipedia shouldn't have a standalone article on it. This is closest thing I could find to an appropriate source, but I would not call this 121-word blurb in depth coverage. This 126-word article doesn't cut it either, and nor does the combination of the two constitute direct, in-depth coverage in secondary sources. Yilloslime ^T_C 18:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Permutations and combinations of nations are not notable. Collect (talk) 20:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage of the topic itself to any significant degree. Non-notable as a result.--BlueSquadronRaven 21:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No actual notable relationship between these countries is apparent. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Yilloslime, lack of non-trivial coverage of the topic & so fails WP:NOTE. Drawn Some (talk) 01:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Cdogsimmons (talk) 20:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per nom. No sources and both smaller countries in area and population. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 23:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.