Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lister Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:06, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lister Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be inadequate evidence of notability-- the references are mere notices or press releases. DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Sources do not seem reliable. Eurodyne (talk) 01:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are notable sources. Karthik (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The given references are a mix of routine company listings, PR and blogs, and searches are turning up nothing better. A company going about its business but not of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.