Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of years in literature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of years in literature[edit]

List of years in literature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strange combination of publishing dates and historical facts, completely unsourced. looks like WP:SYNTH. The Banner talk 20:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Interesting, well worked, and worthwhile. Sources and references can be requested; however as an overview of the subject it is useful...Modernist (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I don't really want to argue WP:OTHERSTUFF, but 'list of years' articles exist in most media forms here, including list of years in film, list of years in music, list of years in television and...several others, as found in this template, which is no different from those. I do not deny this needs sourcing, but that might be a simple manner of pulling out the highlight cite in each year and linking it. Nate (chatter)
  • Keep To me it looks simply like a directory of "(year/century) in literature" articles, with some prose bits (so that it differentiates from solely a category). Sources can be extracted from the year/century articles per Mrschimpf. Non-partisan summaries with NPOV are not sythesis IMHO. 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 05:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A summary of other notable articles. Pburka (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.