Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works with the equal transit-time fallacy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 03:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- List of works with the equal transit-time fallacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure this is a suitable topic for a list; as the intro mentions, the equal transit-time fallacy is a common misconception, and turns up in many different sources. I don't think a list of them is particularly notable or useful, and more importantly, it appears to be completely original research. Robofish (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like original research. Better to do this on a blog and link from the main article on the topic. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Example farm, unsourced OR. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lists are so OR. --Bejnar (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR, neither notable nor useful. Gandalf61 (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.