Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words ending with -uck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of words ending with -uck[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this meets WP:LISTN. Adam9007 (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have found zero reliable sources that discuss the concept of "words ending with uck", thus this is a complete failure of the WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. Rorshacma (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yuck this article; it isn't needed, doesn't meet LISTN (and the five-letter words are incomplete). Nate • (chatter) 21:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck. Call me a schmuck, but I'm dumbstruck by this muck. It should be struck. pburka (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Huck it far, far away. It doth suck so badly I want to upchuck. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even close to being an encyclopedic topic. Pichpich (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTDICT. Chuck this muck. Ajf773 (talk) 23:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If we kept this article, we would establish a precedent that we need to have a list of words for every word ending in the English language. That would be tens, if not hundreds of thousands of words, taking an extremely long time to do. Pointless. MrSwagger21 (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Page creation run amok. --Lockley (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you mean amuck. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Delete WP:NOT Lightburst (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There are legitimate articles on words, but no reason to create articles groping words by spelling.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not sure what is the use of this article , WP:LISTN. Alex-h (talk) 12:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this is better covered at wikt:Rhymes:English/ʌk. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.