Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weapons in Naruto
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of weapons in Naruto[edit]
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; listcruft and unencyclopedic. The source given lists almost exactly the same information, so the link can be added to the Naruto article if necessary hoopydinkConas tá tú? 07:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fairly unnecessary list. Weapons are hardly unique and those that are have better coverage elsewhere. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a list of objects seen in a show, not all of which even merit mention in the anime/manga themselves. What's next, List of furniture in Naruto? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 11:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fancruft, listcruft, weaponcruft or Narutocruft - take your pick !!! DavidHumphreysSPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 13:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom/above and cruft. Zos 18:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)\[reply]
- Delete. Only useful information is character specific ones, and those should be covered on the character's page. – Pedantic79 (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom MarineCorps 20:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unneded cruft. Btw I think next article will be dedicated to describing differences between Naruto 1 and Naruto 2 clothing :D Shinhan 19:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - crappy, really useless fan trivia. Proto::type 10:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This stuff is not needed in Wikipedia. Davidpdx 01:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.