Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Brandy Norwood songs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 October 24. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 23:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List of unreleased Brandy Norwood songs[edit]
- List of unreleased Brandy Norwood songs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unverified lists like this are massive copyright violations. Note how many of the references link to blogs (unreliable sources), and YouTube. Much of the information is speculated and not notable under WP:NSONGS. Any notable songs would have been mentioned in the discography of the artist and/or relevant pages. This page is nearly entirely constructed by searching ASCAP/BMI and listing all of the songs which come up. In reality this is not WP:V and not factual thus it does not have a place in an encyclopedia. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL. If a song has not been released, it cannot have gained notabillity, the main criterion being that of its position in the charts. The only exception would be bootlegs that have reached sufficient notoriety to have been extensively reported in the press. It's a shame to delete this because a lot of work has gone into it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral – The article looks pretty good to me. I think if the unreliable sources were removed, the article would be able to hold itself up. If it can't be done, my vote will be changed to delete. ℥nding·start 05:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – The article is sourced and absolutely similar to the list of unreleased Britney Spears songs or the list of unreleased Michael Jackson material, both of who are featured WP lists. Otherwise, those would have to be deleted, too???
- The difference is that a lot of these are sourced from blogs. ℥nding·start 20:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Because those which are featured lists, use much better sourcing than the junk listed here. In fact the Britney and Michael Jackson list use biographies amongst various other published materials. This does not. WP:WAX. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And a blog or publishing database is no source?
- Because those which are featured lists, use much better sourcing than the junk listed here. In fact the Britney and Michael Jackson list use biographies amongst various other published materials. This does not. WP:WAX. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep looks good to me. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The list is just like the other unreleased songs list. Also everything is sourced. So relevancy. check. quality check. hence KEEP 85.181.123.168 (talk) 20:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.