Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep As per WP:SK, "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance an argument for deletion—perhaps only proposing a non-deletion action such as moving or merging, and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted." PROD disputed in talk as is procedure, no one has !v for delete except nom, and no reason given as per WP:DEL#REASON. Enough time has passed since nomination for it to be closed as SK - it seems the community considers the issues raised in nom not to be sufficient reasons to delete. Article quality issues raised should be addressed in talk and in editing the actual article. Cerejota (talk) 02:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Creator of the article responded on Talk, but didn't give any good reason why there should be a list like this. No references, mostly red links, listing poll results of 2004,.. only purpose seems to be a redirect to pages of political parties. MakeSense64 (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As stated the article can be improved and needs references. But the subject is notable, and I cannot understand the actual rationale behind the nomination. providing information on the political affiliations of the unions is highly relevant (and to clarify, this is by no means controversial in an Indian context). Also, the point of red links is to foment participation in Wikipedia in creating new articles. --Soman (talk) 21:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, that said, I would be ok with remaking the list into more of an article, like "Trade unions in the Singareni coal fields", with more detail and background complementing the list. --Soman (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we remove the 2004 poll results and the red links then not much is left. Perhaps you can merge it into Singareni_Collieries_Company_Limited ? MakeSense64 (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a restructuring at User:Soman/temp. The election results are of interest in this context. I think the subject is notable enough for a separate article (which, amongst other things, allows for categorization in trade union categories). --Soman (talk) 20:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.