Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top trending Google Search queries by year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of top trending Google Search queries by year

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List is not encyclopedic content and we are not the Hot 100. Looks like listcruft and WP:NOTSTATS. List is nothing more than poll/popularity data and maintaining these lists is not what Wikipedia is about. These lists are magnets for UPE/COI promotional editors. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Instagram Business accounts.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 15:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 15:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 15:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. All the content is based on a search result and looking at the links it is unable to obtain data from years prior to 2018. Ajf773 (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Information can be obtained through Google and simply re-hosting that info without adding analysis or additional information makes the list pointless. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 01:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be an indiscriminate listing of statistics. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. I had half a mind to nominate the article myself when I came upon it. wumbolo ^^^ 13:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'll have to agree with the users above, this list fits the definition of a fanlist without enough reason to be. Garlicolive (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. This list adds no additional utility over the primary sources that it is derived from (the original lists published by Google Trends). — Newslinger talk 14:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.