Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the longest-lived United States Governors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 12:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of the longest-lived United States Governors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is 100% unreferenced original research. There is no intersection between long life and being a state governor at some point in time. Fails WP:NLIST and WP:LISTN Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 21:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 21:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 21:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:OR. Not an encyclopedic topic. Pburka (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- More specifically, this is an arbitrary intersection of topics. Longevity and political positions are unrelated topics. It's also WP:SYNTHESIS. Pburka (talk) 02:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:USEFUL, WP:LISTN--Dangermouse600 (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank-you for pointing at LISTN which is a great rational to delete thiz page. Legacypac (talk) 01:52, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per most of the the keep arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-living state leaders. This is not the strongest of list topics for cross categorizing, but not enough for deleting. Every entry can be referenced to a bio page and the ages are compiled from such. OR doesn't apply to this list in my opinion. There is clearly defined criteria for inclusion with no ambiguity. It's a list of people that are obviously notable and factoring in longevity which is at least arguably notable as well. I see no strongly compelling reason to delete this. RoadView (talk) 01:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Living to age 95 or 97 or whatever is not notable at all. Why not a List of US Governors with red hair or ranked by verified height? Legacypac (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hair color and height might actually have some relationship to electoral success. Pburka (talk) 02:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

but how long someone manages to live after retiring, not so much. Legacypac (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Czolgolz (talk) 05:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yet another encyclopedic article that is an appropriate topic for a standalone list. Alansohn (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-living state leaders and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the oldest United States Senators. Star Garnet (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.