Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the best Dancers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g7, author has reposted article as List of some notable dancers. That solves the NPOV problem; someone else can take up any other issues with the new article. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of the best Dancers[edit]
- List of the best Dancers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Given the title, it's necessarily subjective, in violation of WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete I agree, the title makes this a very subjective list and there's probably no way to make it neutral. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete clearly violates WP:NPOV ukexpat (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per nom. Inherently POV. Anturiaethwr (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- this is a first, a combination of someone's opinion and Wikipedia articles. Bearian (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Title is subjective (just who determines are the "best dancers"?) and is filled with POV Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for what I would hope are pretty obvious reasons. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.