Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Ludhiana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Ludhiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by creator. Fails WP:GNG. There are no buildings taller than 52m in this city and the table doesn't even match the single Emporis database source, making this also WP:OR. SportingFlyer T·C 12:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 12:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 12:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. There are ridiculously too many AFDs about "tallest buildings in X". Fundamentally, it is okay/good to have a world-wide list of tallest buildings, and legitimate for that to be broken out to more local areas. Sure, this one seems lower-quality than many other "tallest" articles I've seen. Obviously better, IMHO, to redirect to a larger level tallest buildings list, perhaps List of tallest buildings in India or a closer level. This is part of heading off new creation of same article, and part of remembering what issues with previous version were (because a redirect will survive, and a Talk page hopefully having a link to this AFD will survive, etc.). Come on people, help break the cycle not perpetuate it. Could there be some RFC, some convening of editorial decision-making, instead? --Doncram (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    They are not tall enough for List of tallest buildings in India. Peter James (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. With smaller cities I'd normally agree without demur. There are indeed far too many of these sorts of articles. But note that this is a city of 1.6 million people. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I knew Ludhiana has over a million people when I nominated this, but I don't think it matters - the city does not have many tall buildings, they are all in one complex and of the same height, and they are not well-documented. SportingFlyer T·C 22:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.