Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Aurora, Colorado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that this list is not notable and fails WP:LISTN. Just Chilling (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Aurora, Colorado[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of mostly non-notable building that aren't even that tall. Does not meet WP:LISTN either as there are no sources discussing the buildings as a group. Article likely contains WP:OR and cites only one source emporis.com which is not reliable anyway. Rusf10 (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What Wiki is not. MaskedSinger (talk) 17:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The tallest building here isn't even half as tall as the shortest building at List of tallest buildings in Denver, so I couldn't even suggest a merge to a Colorado article... These are not tall buildings and having all these articles without reliable sources covering the topic is absurd. Reywas92^Talk 18:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:I just don't like it is not valid. Please provide policy statement on the necessary height of buildings for lists. Thank you.Djflem (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maybe one of the buildings may be notable on its own. Cheerio042 (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Blocked sock. Britishfinance (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]
Delete, a list of non notable buildings, and article lacks citations so WP:OR also applies. Ajf773 (talk) 19:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfies Wikipedia:CSC if sources are there. Wikipedia:Before applies.Djflem (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- thirteen storeys is a little underwhelming. This just isn't a notable list, and that's not even considering the reliability issues outlined in the nomination. Reyk _YO! 08:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- This AfD was added to the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list by user:Andrew Davidson.--Rusf10 (talk) 03:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm no fan of the Colonel or of the ARS, but so what? Reyk _YO! 10:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - This needs to be disclosed, so if a sudden wave of keep votes come in, the closer of the discussion knows where they came from.--Rusf10 (talk) 18:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - That doesn't seem to have happened. Thankfully, the days of the ARS being able to muster hordes of keep voters on demand are in the past. Reyk _YO! 06:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Aurora, Colorado per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Satifies Wikipedia:CSC.Djflem (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)05:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.