Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of specific crimes in Melbourne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of specific crimes in Melbourne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced mess. Nominating per budding consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of specific crimes in Newcastle that the other three existent articles along that line should have been nominated too. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bduke (Discussion) 02:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary WP:COATRACK. Everybody at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of specific crimes in Newcastle is absolutely right. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (prattle) @ 18:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (consult) @ 18:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unspecified criteria for inclusion ("specific"), vague definition and scope, WP:COATRACK for author to indulge personal interests. WWGB (talk) 04:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to either List of major crimes in Melbourne or Timeline of major crime in Melbourne. Any coatracking should be addressed by removing inappropriate material, or filling gaps. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC).
Delete Lacking specific criteria for inclusion list is WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.