Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with fruit in the title

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete early per WP:SNOW. WjBscribe 05:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs with fruit in the title

This is a wholly incompetent list. Why would anyone care about a list of songs with a fruit in the title?! Most of the Category:Dynamic_lists_of_songs are useless collections of dust and trivia anyway, but I can understand why something like List of songs about suicide could be useful for someone studying the topic of suicide. I really doubt someone researching fruit is going to look this one up. - hahnch e n 11:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, trivia. >Radiant< 12:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why does this subject matter? It's useless trivia. I can't fathom someone looking for this information. Ever. --Cyrus Andiron 12:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At least until Bob Dylan uses this idea in about series seven of 'theme time radio hour'. Nick mallory 14:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this list is B-A-N-A-N-A-S. Per nom, there are song topics which are not just interesting but notable (e.g. topics of discussion), this is not one of them. --Dhartung | Talk 19:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete like a truck squashing a tomato (disregarding whether a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable) primarily as unattributable, as I see no indication that books or magazine articles or TV shows or other reliable sources have covered this topic. Delete secondarily as an indiscriminate collection of facts; the only criterion is one not shown to be notable or even meaningful. Barno 20:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Now THIS is listcruft!!! MartinDK 21:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Aside from non-notability, this list suffers from a distinct lack of 30,000 pounds of bananas. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ...come to think of it, so does Wikipedia - but alas, WP:ILIKEIT. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wow, that's funny. Send it to BJAODN titles, maybe? Placeholder account 22:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "BJAODN titles" is called WP:DAFT, and this is exactly the sort of reason it was created. 'WP:DAFT and delete. Grutness...wha? 01:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Who comes up with this stupid crap? RFerreira 04:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Meh while we arent running out of space anytime... we certainly are running out of competant list creators/editors. Delete it... find the guy who initially created it and ban him for idiocy, then when your done with that, burn him at the stake to prevent future morons from following in his footsteps. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 05:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.