Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with a color word(s) in their names

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs with a color word(s) in their names[edit]

Just another bunch of songs selected by a trivial and uninteresting criterion. Delete per WP:NOT (indiscriminate collection of information). Reyk _YO! 04:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete listcruft Ace of Sevens 04:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as egregious listcruft. MCB 05:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of, well, take a wild guess. Sandstein 05:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ninten, I mean, listcruft. Danny Lilithborne 08:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, listcruft that is worthless to a researcher. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's seen some 500 edits from a number of editors over the course of a year. And it does give one a way of finding colour usage (OK, maybe not many people have a burning need but my guess is that blue is the most frequently occurring colour and now I'm going back to the article to check that!). Sillier lists have been kept Dlyons493 Talk 11:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page is 80k so it should really be split into List of songs with the color ''red'' in their names, List of songs with the color ''blue'' in their names or some such. Just consider how much human work has gone into creating 80k of a list that's harming nobody. Shame to throw it away IMHO. Dlyons493 Talk 11:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Listcruft, also wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. How many of these song lists are there here? Ydam 14:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft. For some fun, read the List of lists of songs that have been considered the most useless ever. Kusma (討論) 14:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft. Use of color words in song titles might be a worth writing (if there are 2ndary sources), but just listing them? No point. --Tango 15:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to the Marxist Labor theory of value, what something is worth is directly proportional to the amount of work put into it. Fortunately, Marxism is rubbish and so is this list. Delete. BoojiBoy 16:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of info. Extraordinary Machine 21:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and (aeropagatica). Invitatious 23:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as completely idiosyncratic non-topic. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — Holy moley somebody has done a lot of work on this page. Seems a shame to give it the shaft. Ah well. — RJH (talk) 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete list of random x with random y, pure listcruft. --e ivind ^t ^@^c 02:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a data dump. Lists should aid navigation or development, this does neither. JoaoRicardo^talk 02:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if this isn't listcruft then I don't know what is. Dbinder (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although a lot of people have put work into it, including Ninte.. I mean, Superdude. Aguerriero (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.