Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Marilyn Manson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Marilyn Manson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already article titled "Marilyn Manson (band) discography". Not all the songs he recorded are notable. Those that are notable are already in the Marilyn Manson (band) discography. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Nirvana, List of songs recorded by Jay-Z, List of songs recorded by Common, List of songs recorded by the Beatles, List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance, List of songs recorded by "Weird Al" Yankovic
^ There you go, delete those too — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckT187 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. WP:LISTN doesn't require that each members of a list be notable, only that the group itself (i.e. the list or set) be notable. Pburka (talk) 22:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Is there a standard/threshold as to how many songs should be notable themselves in order to keep/delete such an article? I mean, the Beatles example is sitting at about 99% of the listed songs have articles. The one in question is probably closer to 50%. I also wouldn't think the My Chemical Romance article would be a good example of a standard, considering its entirely unsourced. What is the standard for this? Is there one? Sergecross73 msg me 23:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This serves a different purpose to the discography and doesn't duplicate the information there. The discography could be edited to include all the track details, meaning that we would only need one article. --Michig (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Michig. Nomination fails to give a relevant policy/guideline to back the nomination. Some of the content is not being notable is not a sustainable reason for the deletion of any article. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.