Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs by Slipknot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs by Slipknot[edit]

Redundancy: the material is already covered in the discography articles; & no citations Nergaal (talk) 06:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The content is not covered in Slipknot discography, which only lists singles. "No citations" is a surmountable problem because sources are obviously available. Jafeluv (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The songs ARE covered in the 9 album articles! Nergaal (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. The nom just said "discography articles" so I assumed you meant Slipknot discography. Jafeluv (talk) 06:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Majority of songs aren't notable, don't warrant a list. Songs already covered in the track listing section of their articles.KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 23:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Slipknot's discography article. This seems like a logical fit and the list is factual and useful for some people. Deleting the list because some of the songs are singles seems ridiculous: that isn't redundancy, it's a separate list. Tavix | Talk 00:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I agree Bonfire of vanities (talk) 04:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is what the "Slipknot songs" category is for. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't, since not every song is in that category. Tavix | Talk 04:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't they? Even then, all notable songs should be in the category, making this list unnecessary. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list does more than the category, see WP:CLN. Tavix | Talk 02:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This does not address why this list is needed, when the bases are covered by the categories (for notable songs) and individual album pages (for everything else). WesleyDodds (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think it is unnotable to create a list like this. All songs are included in the tracklisting of every album article and this is unneeded. The name of the tracks and the albums they come from is an unreasonable logic for a list I think. There is no additional informational in this list and there never will be, it offers nothing more than what the album articles do and I think merging in to the discography is a very bad idea. REZTER ^TALK ø 00:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not worthy; no references or citations. —Terrence and Phillip 12:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no value in this list, it's simply repeating what can already be found on the album articles. black ngold29 23:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although I did add the demos to this list, I don't think this list has any value to it. The demos aren't that notable anyways. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.