Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of software companies in Poland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Maxim (☎) 21:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of software companies in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY; There is currently such category - Category:Software companies of Poland. Visor (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Visor - What part of the first paragraphs of Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates is unclear? The presence of a similar category is not a valid reason for deletion. Additionally, each of the entries must have some notability since they are all valid WP articles. It is interesting that there is a Unreferenced template on the list! -- Where does one go about finding 3rd party sources that discusses Lists of Software Companies in Poland? You can find my expanded thoughts on that at: Here. This list could indeed be improved with a good lead-in paragraph and some descriptions of each entry, but its doesn't deserve deletion.--Mike Cline (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, lists are not redundant to categories, but another, often more handy way of navigating. --Reinoutr (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable intersection of country and business type. The existence of a category leaves nothing to merge --T-rex 20:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per T-Rex - non-notable intersection. The category will be sufficient. It also has the advantage of being self-maintaining and naturally reducing the chance of irrelevant or non-notable items being added. Stifle (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.