Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sexology topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 05:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of sexology topics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Sexology topics" is not notable as a group or set as required by WP:LISTN, nor is it distinct from sexology. This article is redundant to the categories that cover this and related topics. It also claims to be an outline, but we already have Outline of human sexuality, to which this is redundant (but to be honest, I also see no purpose in that as distinct from categories as well). -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that this is not distinct from the topic of sexology itself. Indeed, the "Scholars of Sexology" is blatantly copied from the original article. I don't see any distinction between this list and the article itself, which more or less discusses all the topics included in the name throughout. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing this article provides that is not (or shouldn't be soon) at Sexology. Reywas92^Talk 20:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't know whether it should be deleted or not, as I'm not familiar with list criteria, but strictly speaking from the perspective of someone performing a Google search, I think this would be much more useful than sifting through 2 articles such as sexology or Outline of human sexuality for something that could be more readily found in such a list. Of course it can be improved on, but it might be handy for someone curious about sexology that just wants to peruse common topics. Anyway, my 2 cents. PK650 (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Note that list-based articles, as navigational aids mentioned above by PK650, are not considered redundant with categories per WP:CLN and in particular, WP:NOTDUP. There may be other reasons for deletion, but "redundancy with categories" cannot be one of them. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 19:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.