Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of reviews by Tim Rogers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 01:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a link repository. Punkmorten 18:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 20:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a collection of internal and external links. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 21:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't see the research advantage of a collection of links of this sort. Delete as per nom. (aeropagitica) 21:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy this is fine on Tim Rogers' user page. Ruby 00:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete is necessary, because of the history comment on the first edit. And it is listcruft. Stifle 19:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. mikka (t) 02:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.