Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of religions that accept homosexuality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of religions that accept homosexuality

Prod removed by author. This article appears to have no prospects but remaining a short and subjective list, and a breeding ground for controversy. I can't see any encyclopedic function it could ever serve.--Fuhghettaboutit 20:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands. Any recreation would need a tight definition: are we talking about religions (Islam Christianity etc) denominations or individual congregations? And what does 'accept' mean: official proouncement? Hopeless as it stands. --Doc ^ask? 20:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; as Doc suggests, "accept" is too vague to make a simple list meaningful. This list's title and content are better covered by full articles on Religion and sexual orientation and by List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality. Nothing to merge and no point to redirect. Melchoir 21:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doubtful this ever will be NPOV, and the article name is wrong since it lists sects rather than religions. Eivind ^t ^@^c 21:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom + the title is pov. Osomec 22:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete too strongly pov ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Khoikhoi 22:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People within sects don't agree on this, let alone religions. GrandmasterkaFile:Blend Flag.jpg^{Impart wisdom} 03:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: First, it lists sects, not religions. Second, you can't establish notability of "religions that accept homosexualitiy" without violating NPOV. Peter Grey 04:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Hyphen5 06:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.