Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of railway stations in Turkmenistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 12:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of railway stations in Turkmenistan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Isn't even a list of railway stations, it a list of towns and cities where they exist Ajf773 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source.Xx236 (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkmenistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination statement appears to identify a content issue rather than an existence issue. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - not a great article by any means but I don't really see a reason to delete a list of railway stations for a country; if it were just a city or region then I'd be in support of deletion. Besides, the user above has added a reliable source to the article. Spiderone 13:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Railway stations usually serve cities and towns. Andrew D. (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just in case my position wasn't clear from my edit above. Most railway stations everywhere in the world share their names with the places that they serve, so the fact that they do so in Turkmenistan is not a reason for deletion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.