Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of protective human features

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of protective human features

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is extremely incomplete, ambiguous in scope and very broad. I'm proposing it for deletion because I think it should be either deleted or redirected to a more appropriate such as Innate immune system (which I think the majority of the topic relates to). Alternatively, if there is a consensus to keep, we can de orphan this page by linking in relevant locations. I look forward to hearing what other editors think. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - What is or is not "protective" as well as what is or is not a "feature" has little clarity. The extreme ambiguity makes me think that deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unsourced since 2003 (!) and poorly defined: one could argue—with sources, even—that pretty much any organ or tissue serves a protective function. The article should not be redirected as the title is not a plausible search term for innate immune system. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom (and my instinct) dibbydib (T ･ C) 05:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm trying to think of how this article could be improved, or what possibly a better title would be, but I'm coming up empty. This is not a well-defined topic or idea. I can't think of a good redirect target either. Natureium (talk) 14:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Be careful not to confuse this article as falling under WP:A&P. ClaudeDavid ^(talk) 01:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.