Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of project management certifications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of project management certifications[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Skimming, I see only primary sources; seems like a shopping guide. -- Beland (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Done poorly as-is, but even though it's not something we're necessarily proud of as a society this is a billion-dollar industry. Wish all the articles around it provided better context, though. Abeg92contribs 15:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, specifically "a resource for conducting business". Exam prices are not encyclopedic. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: If there were articles for more of these certifications I could see voting to categorify and have this redirect to the category; however, even as this is a large industry, this article in its current state seems largely irreparable and as mentioned above is seemingly a shopping guide. I have serious concerns about WP:PROMO if this remains. I guess my strongest argument is WP:TNT, and with that said I have no prejudice to recreation if done completely differently from how it is. TartarTorte 01:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As cited by felow editors clear case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:PROMO Pranesh Ravikumar (talk)Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete prices are subject to change and not likely to be updated. I think it would make sense to have a list page per jurisdiction, but a general global one poses problems HeliosSunGod (talk) 03:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.