Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Seoul Broadcasting System (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Seoul Broadcasting System[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather random listing of programs. Unsourced and often untranslated. WP:NOTTVGUIDE The Banner talk 12:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 13:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:LISTPURP and WP:CLN as complement to Category:Seoul Broadcasting System television programmes; indexing notable TV series by their original broadcast network is completely standard for both lists and categories. If the inclusion criteria needs to be tightened to exclude nonoriginal programming, that's a fixable issue, as are any translation issues or sourcing (if the series is notable, then its originating network is obviously going to be verifiable). Please do not try to use AFD for cleanup. postdlf (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is indeed a standard, bounded list of notable topics. Issues with its completeness, and needing additional sourcing, are solvable problems and not a deletion reason. matt91486 (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per suggestions elaborated above by postdlf and matt91486. Subject meets requirements for stand-alone lists in Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.