Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programmes broadcast by CBeebies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. Can't be bothered arguing so wrapping this up. I did like with every AFD perform a BEFORE search and didn't find anything substantial. If Wikipedia wants an unsourceable indiscriminate list article kept then so be it. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of programmes broadcast by CBeebies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable list, has been largely unsourced since its creation (2014) and I'm unable to find any evidence of any notability for any of the programmes, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTDIR WP:INDISCRIMINATE Dronebogus (talk) 23:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, this article gets tens of thousands of page views each month and has over 3,000 edits to the page so I'd like to see more editor support for deletion before even issuing a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, obviously. CBeebies is the major channel broadcasting to pre-school children in a country with a population of about 66 million. Of course a list of its programmes is a subject an encyclopedia should cover. I'm afraid I simply don't believe the nominator's statement that they couldn't find any evidence of any notability for any of the programmes. Very many of them are rightly blue-linked. And there's nothing directory-like or indiscriminate about listing them. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.