Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of production battery electric vehicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of production battery electric vehicles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too many to list nowadays - for example there must be thousands of 2-wheelers Chidgk1 (talk) 14:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Valid information and navigational list. If its a valid category, Category:Production electric cars, then its a valid list since list give more information and are more useful than categories. Dream Focus 15:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most vehicles are not cars but feel free to rename the article if you wish to reduce its scope Chidgk1 (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a category for Category:Production electric vehicles but it was merged with Category:Electric cars, a subcategory now of Category:Electric vehicles. Last month this article was moved from its original name of List of electric vehicles. We should change it back to match the proper category name. Dream Focus 15:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My argument is based on the current name and scope of the article - if you wish to change its name or scope please go ahead. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see no basis for deletion. This article doesn't attempt to list 2-wheelers anyway, and the article could be renamed to limit scope to automobiles. Existence of a category is not a basis to keep though. In coming years as most models are electrified a thorough reorganization may be appropriate, but not yet. Reywas92^Talk 16:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My argument is based on the current name and scope of the article - it currently has a section for motorcycles and scooters - if you wish to change its name or scope please go ahead. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List_of_production_battery_electric_vehicles#Motorcycles_and_scooters has nothing in it but a redirect telling people where to go for that information. If anything is too long, a side article is created and linked to. Dream Focus 17:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every day I see electric three wheelers - I guess there must be hundreds of manufacturers of 3 wheelers worldwide. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More policy-based input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Also, navigation is better served here using categories. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Valid information and navigational list. WP:Not paper 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:NLIST due to being extensively discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]

References

^ Wang, Q.; Jiang, B.; Li, B.; Yan, Y. (2016). "A critical review of thermal management models and solutions of lithium-ion batteries for the development of pure electric vehicles" (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 64. Elsevier: 106–128.
^ Detlef Stolten; Nancy Garland; Remzi C. Samsun, eds. (2016). Fuel Cells; Data, Facts, and Figures. Wiley. p. 30. ISBN 9783527693917.
^ Hovi, I.B.; Pinchasik, D.R.; Figenbaum, E.; Thorne, R.J. (2019). "Experiences from battery-electric truck users in Norway". World Electric Vehicle Journal. 11 (1): 5.
^ Ma, H.; Balthasar, F.; Tait, N.; Riera-Palou, X.; Harrison, A. (2012). "A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles" (PDF). Energy Policy. 44: 160–173.
^ Hardman, S.; Shiu, E.; Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). "Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 88: 40–57.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] Wang, Q.; Jiang, B.; Li, B.; Yan, Y. (2016). "A critical review of thermal management models and solutions of lithium-ion batteries for the development of pure electric vehicles" (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 64. Elsevier: 106–128.

[2] Detlef Stolten; Nancy Garland; Remzi C. Samsun, eds. (2016). Fuel Cells; Data, Facts, and Figures. Wiley. p. 30. ISBN 9783527693917.

[3] Hovi, I.B.; Pinchasik, D.R.; Figenbaum, E.; Thorne, R.J. (2019). "Experiences from battery-electric truck users in Norway". World Electric Vehicle Journal. 11 (1): 5.

[4] Ma, H.; Balthasar, F.; Tait, N.; Riera-Palou, X.; Harrison, A. (2012). "A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles" (PDF). Energy Policy. 44: 160–173.

[5] Hardman, S.; Shiu, E.; Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). "Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 88: 40–57.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]