Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prank flash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of prank flash[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Keep I check all links here as a just in case.
- Unsigned comment by User:151.197.194.218. User's third edit. --InShaneee 04:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lists of links to flash animation is not encyclopedic Dyslexic agnostic 06:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; WP:NOT a link repository --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 06:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic. Daniel Case 06:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This page has only been created to clean up the 'prank flash' page, you can't split information out and then immediately delete it because it looks wrong on its own. This discussion's been had many times on List of Shock Sites and the proposal to delete has always been shouted down because people find this stuff informative. Take the links down and just leave the descriptions if that will help it fit policy better. - unsigned by User:194.200.167.69 07:43, 13 January 2006
Keep This is not an entry on its own, but a link off the entry for prank flash. It's the result of cleaning up,not a new entry so of course it would be "unencyclopedic", since all the encyclopedic information is on the original entry.
- Unsigned comment by User:220.255.42.84. User's only edit. --InShaneee 04:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepIt's informational.
Delete nonsense. --Terence Ong 08:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsigned comment by User:24.89.202.84. User's only edit. --InShaneee 04:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've changed my vote. The Prank Flash article has been restored, so this is now pointless.--Tenka Muteki 05:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. --InShaneee 22:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a good reference and a good warning for people.
- Unsigned comment by User:69.112.43.41. --InShaneee 04:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No one will ever know how much this list has saved me from heart attacks. KEEP IT!
- Unsigned comment by User:65.4.27.229. User's second edit. --InShaneee 04:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as listcruft -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 07:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think all of the "keeps" are sockpuppets of the same person. Dyslexic agnostic 08:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if we're all the same person, isn't it entirely possible for all these 'Deletes' to be 'sock puppets' as well? Pot calling the kettle black, eh?
- Unsigned comment by User:65.4.27.229 on 10:24, 14 January 2006. Please learn to sign with ~~~~. -- Dyslexic agnostic 20:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from personal attacks, Dyslexic agnostic.--Tenka Muteki 20:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I support deleting this site -- 68.148.192.33 20:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anything relevant to List of shock sites and then leave a redirect. Stifle 01:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic Dlyons493 Talk 03:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both this and List of shock sites, but definitely this one. 161.184.71.53 08:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, listcruft. Pavel Vozenilek 21:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.