Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of population milestones by country

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of population milestones by country[edit]

List of population milestones by country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Useless, incomplete, very low page demand. EnigmaLord515 (talk) 03:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The topic seems interesting but the page is incomplete and the article is not well-cited. Arashtitan talk 16:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:57, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Certainly interesting, but seems to be original research. Every way of formatting and presenting information is not what an encyclopedia is all about. Borock (talk) 05:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as there's hardly much of an article yet. SwisterTwister talk 01:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The topic seems notable, but this article is an unsourced stub. If we can't find available sources on historical demography, this is never going to improve. Dimadick (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article topic itself (and how the whole article is structured) is a hopeless case of WP:OR. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.