Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pop culture references in Family Guy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 21:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An unusually crappy nomination from me, but here goes: A clear case of WP:NOT indiscriminate collector of information.
brenneman(t)(c) 03:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I dunno. For most other series, sure. But the random references have always been a big part of Family Guy's humor. I don't see it as being any that much less important than a listing of the characters. That said, there's generally an area for the references made in the induvidal episode entries. - SAMAS
- Delete per nom. This is different from a list of characters. A list of characters is finite and definable. A list of "pop culture references" is open to interpretation and therefore inherently POV. It's impossible to define what makes up a pop culture refenece. Crunch 05:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Potentially endless and also not encyclopedic. I also don't know if there is any other "List of pop culture references in..." deals "List of pop-culture references in the Simpsons", "List of pop culture references in Futurama, "List of pop culture references in Mystery Science Theater 3000", etc all get nothing.--T. Anthony 05:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That said a list of titles that reference television or literature titles could maybe be doable. In least in that titles are more finite and definite of a thing.--T. Anthony 05:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Agamemnon2 06:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ComputerJoe 08:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd reckon that there's somewhere this could be merged. Delete if not.--Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Aaron. Proto t c 10:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I started this page last night, while in an altered state of conciousness, and now I see that the page is not really appropriate. I just thought it would've been fun. I apologize.
- Don't feel too bad. There are like a dozen lists related to the Simpsons so if you ever want to try again maybe you'll be able to do a list relating to this show that's easier to manage.--T. Anthony 15:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - Creator himself gives up on the page, also this would be better dealt with in individual artices/sections summarizing each episode. Cyde Weys votetalk 15:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Does not qualify as a speedy, as other people than the creator have already contributed to the article. Turnstep 16:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are better places for everything listed here on other FG articles. This list would be exceptionally unmaintainable, since FG is essentially a show that is built on a foundation of pop culture references and allusions. Youngamerican 15:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, simply because there is a far more complete list on the actual Family Guy page. Grandmasterka 21:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fanlistcruft. Stifle 01:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, et alii. -- Krash 01:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.