Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political flops (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 06:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of political flops[edit]
Violates WP:OR, and lack of sources. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political flops
- Delete as nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if sourced, at least as a concept. Which I believe can be done, but if it's not, go ahead and delete. Identifying the "flops" themselves as a whole isn't needed though. FrozenPurpleCube 04:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless a political incident or event was referred to as a "political flop" in a published source, the sources are not valid as per WP:NOR ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I think my choice of words must not have been clear. What I mean is that there doesn't need to be a single source that lists all of the flops together, nor do we need to worry about whether any of the "flops" on the page is one or not, if there's a source discussing the subject. That sort of thing can be handled on cleanup. FrozenPurpleCube 04:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless a political incident or event was referred to as a "political flop" in a published source, the sources are not valid as per WP:NOR ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as subjective. Come on, who thinks "flops" is an objective, encyclopedic term? Doczilla 06:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced, and subjective. Many of the items on the list are in my opinion not flops, just clear defeats. I wouldn't call the Goldwater's defeat in 1964 a "flop", he garnered several southern states and lost due to an agenda which was viewed as too conservative. I wouldn't call a big loss to the hugely popular president Reagan in 1984 a flop either. Landslide elections happen for many reasons, not just gaffes and flops, and is a part of democratic politics. Basically a collection of items, the title is not neutral, and serious issues with the possibility of keeping this in line with WP:NPOV. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-While an article on the concept might work, this just doesn't, since there's no criteria for one constitutes a "flop". Even in a perfectly sourced state, it would only be a list of endeavors called flops, since is an inherently subjective term.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is a flop itself. Reeks of WP:OR. Whsitchy 15:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not only is this original research, but there's a possible BLP concern.Blueboy96 12:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, invented here, cruft, unmaintainable. Pavel Vozenilek 13:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV, cruft, everything that has been said Sleep On It 18:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per most of the above. Carlossuarez46 20:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom., and most of the above comments --JayJasper 21:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.