Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people driving Tesla Roadster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of people driving Tesla Roadster[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely unencyclopedic. WP:DAFT worthy. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WHIM. Why not any model of car under the sun? Add me to List of people driving Honda Fit. Actually, please don't. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too trivial for an article, however notable early adopters of the car could be mentioned in its own article as they were in the news media. Arnold Schwarzeneger got a lot of attention for his purchase. Borock (talk) 04:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Incredibly trivial, and probably impossible to complete... Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 05:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointless and spammy. WWGB (talk) 05:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the topic is far too trivial. Why not list of people wearing white shirts while we're at it? JIP | Talk 06:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Utterly absurd. Salt the title just in case someone else tries to remake this farce (also, SALT the correct grammatical forms of the title as well). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:03, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List has 2 entries. That alone suggests a merge to Tesla Roadster, at best: if List of people with Godlike powers of life and death had 2 entries, I'd still suggest a merge. But based on the above comments, it's not considered that important. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.