Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people declared persona non grata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 16:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sad to see that this list was deleted.... it contained a great deal of data that is no longer accessible.

It seems to me that the article got messy simply because so many russian diplomats people were added to the list as a result of their invasion of Ukraine.

How can I access the missing data ? Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of people declared persona non grata[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While instances of people being declared persona non grata are covered in the news, and can be included in the articles on (notable) people, I don't see indication that this group list of numerous people as presented here meets NLIST. There seems to be nothing, in this article or in the sources, connecting the different entries or discussing them. While there is some coverage of specific countries or groups of people (ie [1] or [2], I think the scope of this article, including people from any country or any group, is hopelessly broad. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is an interesting list that is well sourced and clearly meets notability.KatoKungLee (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:NLIST. Individual cases are well-sourced, but the group has not been discussed as a group. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 21:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:NLIST it is rather WP:INDISCRIMINATE. What is the criteria for inclusion? Persona non grata, from the beginning of time? As the nominator has stated, "the scope is hopelessly broad". Lightburst (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NLIST, utterly WP:INDISCRIMINATE and inevitably WP:POV. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.