Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of opponents of PETA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete — Caknuck 05:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of opponents of PETA[edit]
- List of opponents of PETA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated people, being an opponent of PETA isn't a defining characteristic so this is a loose association to group people by. Also, only seven names on the list which could easily be mentioned in one sentence of the main article. I haven't nominated the related List of supporters of PETA, but if there's a consensus for deleting here then I'll AFD that one as well. Masaruemoto 01:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the nom. The article is not and will never be complete. A certain amount of WP:OR is required as well. JodyB Roll, Tide, Roll 01:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pointless since PETA article itself should reflect any reliably sourced criticism. SolidPlaid 01:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is a loosely associated and unencyclopedic list. I think we should afd the list of supports as well. Chris! ct 02:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pointless, loosely associated. JJL 02:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 07:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge with List of supporters of PETA, renamed to List of supporters and opponents of PETA. -kotra 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: if this goes, so should List of supporters of PETA, which is almost exclusively referenced by one biased and unreliable source: PETA itself. -kotra 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.