Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number one videos on VSpot Top 20 Countdown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of number one videos on VSpot Top 20 Countdown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unencyclopædic listcruft; no sources, but even if there were, I can't see how it could meet any notability criterion. Mel Etitis (Talk) 21:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not appropatie for WP Regan123 13:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - listcruft, WP:VSCA. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Inapropriate, useless. Retiono Virginian 15:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic, trivial list, WP:NOT suitable for inclusion. Arkyan • (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I believe this type of information is generally incorporated by succession boxes. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 16:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 16:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —dima/talk/ 18:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.