Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one singles from the 2000s

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 16:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one singles from the 2000s[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An example where categorization (see Category:2000s record charts) is the better venue over a list, in particular a list of lists. Otherwise, there should be lists like this for every year and every decade. The only similar lists are the even more generic Lists of number-one songs and Lists of number-one albums which, for the most part, just take you to more "lists of lists of number ones" for a specific country or chart. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary and very incomplete duplication of Category:2000s_record_charts and Category:Lists of number-one songs. Dricherby (talk) 21:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No content. Can't understand why the the prod was removed. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:49, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.